期刊文献+

行政责令行为法律规范分析及立法规范 被引量:31

An Analysis of the Legal Provisions and Legal Legislation on Administrative Orders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 责令行为规范普遍存在于现行法律中,责令行为规范可分为司法责令规范和行政责令规范。行政责令规范可进一步分为内部行政责令规范和外部行政责令规范。通过对行政责令行为内涵的考量,可以确立特定的界分基准,将外部责令行为中的处罚性责令行为与命令性责令行为进行明确区分。根据法律规范中"制裁"要素的结构,可将具有行政命令性的责令行为规范分为五种类型,不同结构类型体现出不同的法律规范功能。现行的行政责令行为规范存在词义界定不明确、结构选用不合理、行为配置不科学等诸多问题,有必要构建典型的行政责令行为规范模型,以推动行政责令法律规范的统一性、规范性和科学性。 Order provisions,a common part of the current law,can be divided into provisions of judicial order and those of administrative order.The provisions of administrative order can be further divided into inner order actions and external order actions.An examination of the connotation of the administrative order action may lead to the establishment of specific standards,with the help of which the external order actions can clearly be classified into penalty order actions and non-penalty order actions. It is necessary to classify order actions before their nature can be determined.The nature of "ordering for suspension" can be classified from the following three aspects.First,"ordering for suspension" with a penalty nature can only be made after legal qualification has been obtained.Secondly,the overall suspension of the party's business shall be classified as penalty order action,while the order to suspend illegal business shall be classified as non-penalty order action.Finally,ordering to suspend non-production and non-business activities is not equal to "ordering for suspension of production or business," nor does it have the attributes of administrative penalty.The nature of other order actions can be judged from the punitive features of the administrative penalty. Generally,the structure of legal legislation is composed of three elements:the assumed element,the processing element and the sanctionative element.According to the structure of the "sanctionative element" in the order provision,non-penalty order actions are categorized into five types,namely,unconstrained single order structure,constrained single order structure,selecting punishment structure,conditioning punishment structure and punishment structure.Different types of structure reflect different functions of regulation. The current provisions of administrative order have some demerits,such as inaccurate term definition,unreasonable structure choice,and unscientific action establishment.Specifically speaking,the "order" in some provisions applies to the parties with no relationship of subordination or management,which goes against both the general meaning and specific meaning of "order." Some provisions do not take into account the structure function and applicable cases of the "sanctionative element," which results in the unfair legislation.Some provisions do not distinguish the function of administrative order from that of administrative penalty,and do not take into account the sanction strength of specific administrative orders and administrative penalties.It is necessary to construct a typical model for administrative order to make the administrative legal provisions more unified,normative and scientific. The typical model for administrative order should obey two principles:fully embodying the remedial function of order actions and ensuring the execution of administrative order.In the combined order provisions,administrative orders become the assistant measures of other administrative actions,and are absorbed by other administrative actions in procedures and relief-granting.The provision of "unconstrained single command structure" does not include the legal consequence of failing to perform the administrative order,which greatly weakens its authority and executive effect.Therefore,"the constrained single command structure" should be taken as the typical model of administrative order,that is,"administrative order + ‘refused to … ’ + sanctions." The key parts of typical model are "administrative order" and "sanctions." The major function of the "sanctions" is ensuring the performance of administrative orders.Thus,the "sanctions" should normally contain the executive measures as well as the corresponding punitive measures if necessary.
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期101-111,共11页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(09JDDF003YB) 2008年浙江省"钱江人才"计划项目(205000-F40801)
关键词 责令行为 规范结构 行政命令 行政处罚 order actions provision structure administrative order administrative penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1马克思.《对民主主义者莱茵区域委员会的审判》[A]..《马克思恩格斯全集》第6卷[C].人民出版社,1961年版.第291页.第33页.
  • 2[日]田中二郎.新版行政法上[Z].,昭和四十二年.第170页.
  • 3张剑寒 等.《行政制裁制度》[Z].行政院研究发展考核委员会编印,1979年.第195页.第5页以下.
  • 4洪家殷.《第十四章.行政制裁》[A].翁岳生主编.《行政法(2000)》下册[C].中国法制出版社,2002年版.第825页.
  • 5吴庚.《行政法之理论与实用》[M].,.第423页.
  • 6陈新民.《行政法学总论》[M].,.第281页.
  • 7科伦布茨高级行政法院.NVwZ[Z].,1986年.第762页.
  • 8See J. A. G. Griffith and H. Street, Principles of Administrative Law, London: Sir Issac Pitman & Sons Ltd., 1952;LouisL. Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action, Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1965.
  • 9[德]哈特穆特·毛雷尔 高家伟译.《行政法学总论》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第156—157页.

共引文献130

同被引文献315

引证文献31

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部