期刊文献+

基于混合型评价矩阵的多属性群决策方法 被引量:35

Multi-attribute group decision making method based on hybrid evaluation matrix
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文针对具有语言型、直觉模糊数和区间直觉模糊数三种评价信息的混合型多属性群决策问题,提出一种基于属性权重和专家权重均未知的决策方法.首先,定义新的转换函数,可将不同粒度的语言评价信息统一成区间直觉模糊数;然后,基于支持度确定未知属性权重,并在综合考虑区间直觉模糊数熵值和相似度的基础上,建立了一种新的专家权重确定模型;在将混合型决策矩阵转换成区间直觉模糊决策矩阵后,利用IIFWA算子依次集结个体决策矩阵,从而得出方案集的排序.最后,应用在ERP选优问题中,验证了方法的有效性. In this paper, we investigate a multi-attribute group decision making method with unknown attributes' weights and experts' weights in which the information provided by each decision maker in ex- pressed as the hybrid decision matrix where each of the elements is expressed by intuitionistic fuzzy number, interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy number and linguistic labels. First, define a transformation function which can change multi-granularity linguistic variables to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Then, ensure the unknown attributes' weights based on the support degrees, and next establish a model to ensure the weights of decision makers which considering the entropy and similarity of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. After transform hybrid decision matrices to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy matrices, we can aggregate these individual decision matrices by using IIFWA operation for ranking alternatives. Finally, an illustrative example for supplier selection is given to prove this method.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期473-481,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71271072) 浙江省自然科学基金(Y61 10345) 教育部人文社会科学研究基金(09YJC630055) 安徽省自然科学基金(090416247)
关键词 群决策 混合决策矩阵 语言评价 直觉模糊数 区间直觉模糊数 group decision-making hybrid decision matrix linguistic evaluation intuitionistic fuzzy value interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy value entropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,(01):87-96.
  • 2Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J].Information and Control,1965,(03):338-353.
  • 3Atanassov K,Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1989,(03):343-349.
  • 4Atanassov K,Georgiev C. Intuitionistic fuzzy prolog[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1993,(02):121-128.
  • 5Wang Z J,Li K W,Wang W Z. An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights[J].Information Sciences,2009,(17):3026-3040.
  • 6Xu Z S,Yager R R. Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2009,(02):123-139.
  • 7Xu Z S,Yager R R. Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2008,(01):246-262.
  • 8Xu Z S. A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making[J].Information Sciences,2009,(01):181-190.
  • 9Xu Z S. Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2007,(02):109-121.
  • 10Xu Z S. Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2007,(03):221-236.

二级参考文献44

  • 1Tong M, Bonissone P P. A linguistic approach to decision making with fuzzy sets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1980, 10: 716-723.
  • 2Zadeh L A. A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 1983, 9: 149-184.
  • 3Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On aggregation operations of linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993, 8: 351-370.
  • 4Yager R R. Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making[J]. Group Decision Negotiation, 1993, 2: 81-93.
  • 5Torra V. Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996, 11: 975-988.
  • 6Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78: 73-87.
  • 7Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A linguistic modelling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part A, 1997, 27: 126-132.
  • 8Godo L, Torra V. On aggregation operators for ordinal qualitative information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8: 143-154.
  • 9Herrera F, Martínez L. A fusion method for managing multi-granularity linguistic terms sets in decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 43-58.
  • 10Herrera F, Martínez L. A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranualr hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-part B, 2001, 31: 227-233.

共引文献372

同被引文献542

引证文献35

二级引证文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部