期刊文献+

基于模糊证据推理的系统风险分析与评价 被引量:37

System risk analysis and evaluation approach based on fuzzy evidential reasoning
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对系统风险分析与评价中面临的模糊不确定风险信息建模问题,以及风险因素信息融合问题.在模糊集理论与证据理论研究的基础上.采用模糊证据推理技术,提出了基于模糊证据推理的系统风险分析与评价方法的具体算法与处理操作流程.首先通过故障模式及影响分析进行风险识别,采用模糊信度结构模型建立风险不确定性的统一描述框架,然后通过数据预处理算法、模糊证据推理信息融合算法以及模糊风险排序方法完成风险评价结果计算;文末以某航天发射场火箭推进剂加注系统风险分析为例,验证了方法的可行性与有效性.该方法定量化分析系统部件的风险程度,为后续风险应对措施的制定提供辅助决策支持. In order to deal with problems of risk modeling under fuzzy uncertainty and risk information fusion, the risk analysis and evaluation approach based on fuzzy evidential reasoning and its solution procedure are proposed on the basis of fuzzy set theory and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Firstly, failure mode and effects analysis is used for identifying risk factors and fuzzy belief structure is for building the uniform risk model. Secondly, the original qualitative and quantitative risk data is transformed into fuzzy belief structures using the pretreatment algorithm. Then, risk information fusion is completed using the fuzzy evidential reasoning and fuzzy intersection match algorithm, and risk evaluation result is ordered by the fuzzy risk ranking method. Finally, a risk analysis example of rocket propellant adding system in space launch site is examined to illustrate and show the applicability of the approach. The proposed approach may successfully analyze the system risk degree and provide decision making support for risk response.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期529-537,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70971131 71001104 71201168)
关键词 风险分析 风险评价 模糊信度结构 证据推理 模糊排序 risk analysis risk evaluation fuzzy belief structure evidential reasoning fuzzy ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1DoD. Risk management guide for DoD acquisition[M].Washington,DC:Department of Defense,2006.
  • 2Haimes Y Y. Risk Modeling,Assessment,and Management[M].Wiley Press,2008.
  • 3袁家军.神舟飞船系统工程管理[M]北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
  • 4符志民.航天项目风险管理[M]北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
  • 5NASA. Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners[M].Washington,DC:Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA Headquarters,2002.
  • 6SEI. Continuous risk management guidebook[D].Carnegie Mellon University,1997.
  • 7Haimes Y Y,Kaplan S,Lambert J H. Risk filtering,ranking,and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling[J].Risk Analysis,2002,(02):383-397.
  • 8Bedford T,Cooke R. Probalilistic Risk Analysis:Foundations and Methods[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 9符志民,李汉铃.航天研发项目风险分析、等级评估及相关性研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(1):52-59. 被引量:26
  • 10赵丽艳,顾基发.概率风险评估(PRA)方法在我国某型号运载火箭安全性分析中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2000,20(6):91-97. 被引量:27

二级参考文献14

共引文献48

同被引文献397

引证文献37

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部