期刊文献+

桥台支座布置方式对连续梁桥地震反应的影响 被引量:12

Effects of abutment′s bearing distribution on seismic response of continuous bridges
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了避免桥台的地震破坏,提出一种新型桥台支座布置方式,通过双向滑动支座、弹塑性挡块和拉压连接装置的联合作用来工作.以2座连续梁桥为例,通过新型桥台支座布置方式和传统桥台支座布置方式的对比研究,分析了挡块屈服力、桥台约束刚度对桥梁横向地震反应的影响.结果表明:对于传统桥台支座布置方式,桥台承受的地震力随着地震强度的增大而增加,存在地震破坏风险;对于新型桥台支座布置方式,可以通过调节挡块横向屈服力来控制桥台地震力,既可使桥台分担一部分结构地震惯性力,又可避免桥台破坏.进行抗震设计时,可以根据具体的桥梁和对应的地震动输入,选择合适的桥台挡块横向屈服力,以使整座桥梁的地震反应达到最优状态. A abutment′s bearing distribution was advanced to avoid abutment′s earthquake effects,which united the two-way sliding bearing,the elastic-plastic fender and the tension-compression link to work.Taking two continuous bridges as an example,the abutment′s bearing distribution was analyzed compared with the traditional abutment′s bearing distribution,which could reflect the fender′s yielding force and the abutment restriction stiffness′influence on the bridges′lateral seismic response.Results show that as for the traditional abutment′s bearing distribution,the abutment′s earthquake force would increase along with the earthquake′s increment.Therefore,the abutment would have the risk of damage in the earthquake.As for the new abutment′s bearing distribution,the fender′s lateral yielding force can be adjusted to control the abutment′s earthquake force,therefore,the abutment not only shares a part of superstructure′s earthquake inertia force,but also avoids itself earthquake damage.As for the seismic design of continuous bridge,based on the bridge structure and the earthquake input,the fender′s reasonable yielding force can be selected to make the whole structure′s seismic response best.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期117-121,共5页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51108460) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2011M500983) 中南大学博士后科研启动基金资助项目 中南大学自由探索计划资助项目(2012QNZT047)
关键词 桥梁 抗震设计 桥台 支座布置 挡块 bridge seismic design abutment bearing distribution fender
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘光晏,张国镇.Parametric study on performance of bridge retrofitted by unseating prevention devices[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2006,5(1):111-118. 被引量:4
  • 2JTJ004-89,公路工程抗震设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,1990.
  • 3李忠献,韩强.汶川大地震中山区公路桥梁典型震害及初步分析[C]//汶川地震工程震害调查交流研讨会,成都,2008.
  • 4吉随旺.5.12汶川大地震四川公路震害调查分析[C]//汶川地震工程震害调查交流研讨会,成都,2008.
  • 5袁一凡.汶川地震15问[C]//汶川地震工程震害调查交流研讨会,成都,2008.
  • 6洪晓慧.从汶川地震看桥梁耐震问题与对策探讨[R].台湾地震工程研究中心.Http:// http://www.ncree.org.
  • 7George C,Lee.The 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake of China-Preliminary Report[R].Http://www.mceer.buffalo.edu/research/Reconnaissance/China 5-12-08/China EQ6-15-08.pdf.
  • 8绵竹市交通局.绵竹市5.12特大地震交通基础设施灾后重建规划[R].四川:绵竹市交通局,2008.
  • 9GB/T24336-2009,生命线工程地震破坏等级划分[S].
  • 10Abeysinghe R S, Gavaise E, Rosignoli M, et al. Pushover analysis of inelastic seismic behavior of gTeveniotikos bridge [ J ]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 2002,7 (2) : 115-126.

共引文献264

同被引文献77

引证文献12

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部