期刊文献+

哥本哈根社会心理问卷的信度和效度研究 被引量:1

Reliability and validity of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire of Chinese version
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检验哥本哈根社会心理问卷(COPSOQ)的中文短版的信度和效度,评价其与亚健康症状评价问卷(SHSQ-25)联合使用的应用价值。方法以参加2012年度北京市宣武医院健康体检的本院在职职工(≥40岁)作为调查对象进行问卷调查,运用Cronbach′sα系数、因子分析、Spearman相关分析评价COPSOQ中工作应激相关的5个模块(工作要求、个人影响和发展、人际关系和领导能力、工作不稳定性以及工作满意度)的同质信度、结构效度和其与亚健康症状评价问卷结果的关联性。结果问卷5个模块的Cronbach′sα系数在0.791~0.891之间,因子分析结果示问卷的结构效度与理论模式基本吻合。此外,Spearman相关分析提示问卷中工作应激相关的5个模块与亚健康症状具有相关性(P<0.05)。结论 COPSOQ中文版的信度与效度良好,其与SHSQ-25联合可应用于评价工作应激与亚健康的关联。 Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese shortversion of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire(COPSOQ),and to assess the practical value of COPSOQ combined with suboptimal health status questionnaires-25(SHSQ-25).Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted in employees aged 40 years and above who participated in the 2012 annual health medical examination from Xuanwu Hospital.The five dimensions of COPSOQ related to work stress(demands at work,individual influence and development,interpersonal relations and leadership,insecurity at work,and job satisfaction) were tested with the Cronbach′salpha coefficients analysis,factor analysis and Spearman correlation analysis for internal consistency,factorial validity,and correlation with the result of SHSQ-25.Results The Cronbach′s alpha coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.791 to 0.891.The results of factor analysis found the factor loading pattern was corresponded to the theoretical structure of the COPSOQ.In addition,the results of the Spearman correlation analysis indicated the five dimensions related to work stress in the questionnaire were associated with suboptimal health status(P〈0.05).Conclusions The Chinese short version of COPSOQ is a valid and reliable tool for workplace survey.Combined with SHSQ-25,the COPSOQ can also be used for evaluating the correlation between work stress and suboptimal health.
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第1期12-15,共4页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81102208) 国家科技支撑计划(2012BAI37B03)
关键词 哥本哈根社会心理问卷 亚健康症状评价问卷 信度 效度 COPSOQ SHSQ-25 Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1尚莉,刘苹,范琳波,顾华康,李健.哥本哈根社会心理问卷信度与效度的测评[J].环境与职业医学,2008,25(6):572-576. 被引量:6
  • 2赵瑞芹,宋振峰.亚健康问题的研究进展[J].中国社会医学杂志,2002,19(1):10-13. 被引量:131
  • 3刘朝杰.问卷的信度与效度评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1997,5(4):174-177. 被引量:213
  • 4YX Yan,YQ Liu,M Li.Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for measuring suboptimal health status in urban Chinese[].Journal of Epidemiology.2009
  • 5European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational safety and health. http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/factsheets/74 . 2008
  • 6Kristensen TS,Hannerz H,Hgh A,et al.The Copenhagen psycho-social questionnaire———A tool for the assessment and improvement of thepsychosocial work environment[].Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health.2005
  • 7Borritz M,,Bultmann U,Rugulies R,et al.Psychosocial work char-acteristics as predictors for burnout:ndings from 3-year follow upof the PUMA Study[].Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2005
  • 8Ghaddar A,Mateo I,Sanchez P.Occupational stress and mental health among correctional officers:a cross sectional study[].Journal of Occupational Health.2008
  • 9Tsutsmi,A,Umehara,K,Ono,H,et al.Types ofpsychosocial job demands and adverse events due to dentalmismanagement:acrosssectional study[].BMC OralHealth.2007
  • 10US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Thechanging organization of work and the safety and health of work-ing people. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/02-116pd.html . 2008

二级参考文献18

  • 1杨文杰,李健.工作场所中社会心理因素的测量——两种职业紧张检测模式的应用[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2004,22(6):422-426. 被引量:150
  • 2European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational safety and health [ EB/OL ]. [ 2008-05-01 ] http://osha.europa.eu/eu/publications/ factsheets/74.
  • 3US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people[ EB/ OL ]. [ 2008-05-01 ]http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/02-116pd.html.
  • 4KARASEK R A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign[ J ]. Adm Sci Q, 1979, 24( 2 ): 285-308.
  • 5SIEGRIST J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/lowreward conditions at work[ J ]. J Occup Health Psychol, 1996, 1 ( 1 ): 27-43.
  • 6KRISTENSEN T S, HANNERZ H, HOGH A, el al. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment [ J ]. Scand J Work Environ Health, 2005, 31 ( 6 ): 438-449.
  • 7AUST B, RUGULIES R, SKAKON J, et al. Psychosocial work environment of hospital workers: validation of a comprehensive assessment scale[ J ]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2007, 44( 5 ): 814-825.
  • 8PEJTERSEN J, ALLERMANN L, KRISTENSEN TS, et al. Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices[ J ]. Indoor Air, 2006, 16( 5 ): 392-401.
  • 9BORRITZ M, BULTMANN U, RUGULIES R, et al. Psychosocial work characteristics as predictors for burnout: findings from 3-year follow up of the PUMA Study [ J ]. J Occup Environ Med, 2005, 47 ( 10): 1015-1025.
  • 10RUGULIES R, CHRISTENSEN K B, BORRITZ M, et al. The contribution of the psychosocial work environment to sickness absence in human service workers: results of a 3-year follow-up study [ J ]. Work Stress, 2007, 21 ( 4 ): 293-311.

共引文献347

同被引文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部