期刊文献+

关于我国长期存在投资率过高、消费率过低的若干问题——评“迷思论”和“杞人忧天论” 被引量:2

Several Issues Concerning the Long-term Overinvestment and Underconsumption in Our Country:on the “Myth Argument” and “Unwarranted Anxiety Argument”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对"迷思论"和"杞人忧天论",揭示了我国长期存在的高投资率、低消费率的客观事实;阐述了衡量投资率是否过高、消费率是否过低的理论标准;据此历数了高投资率、低消费率造成的种种严重后果;指出了上述观点并不是源自马克思主义,而是源自古典的和现代的西方经济学;分析了上述观点反映了当前我国某些特殊社会群体的利益诉求。 Against the "myth argument" and "unwarranted anxiety argument," this paper reveals the objec- tive fact of long-term overinvestment and underconsumption in our country; expounds the theoretical standards to measure the value of investment rate and consumption rate; indicates the various severe consequences brought by overinvestment and underconsumption; points out that the origins of the arguments are not Marxism but classical and contemporary western economics; and analyzes such arguments as reflection of interest claims by special social groups in current China.
作者 汪海波
出处 《中国延安干部学院学报》 2013年第1期86-99,共14页 Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Yan’an
关键词 “迷思论”和“杞人忧天论” 客观事实 衡量的理论标准 严重后果 理论根源 社会根源 "myth argument" and "unwarranted anxiety argument " objective truth theoretical standards for measurement severe consequences theoretical origin social origin
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献2

共引文献14

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部