期刊文献+

微创Quadrant系统在腰椎退变疾病手术中的应用 被引量:11

The application of Quadrant system in Surgical treatment of lumbar degeneration diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创Quadrant系统下经多裂肌间隙入路椎弓根螺钉固定,椎间植骨融合(TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的近期疗效及安全性。方法 2010-01-2012-03,72例腰椎退行性疾病患者接受了单节段TLIF手术,采用微创Quadrant系统下手术33例(微创组),传统开放手术39例(开放组),对两组切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、近期临床疗效、并发症等进行比较。结果所有患者均获随访,随访时间12~18月,平均15月。两组手术时间无明显统计学差异(P>0.05),微创组术中出血量、伤口引流量、住院天数、术后应用镇痛药剂量均明显低于开放组(P<0.01),微创组术后疼痛评分(VSA评分)及ODI功能指数较开放组明显降低(P<0.01),两组患者均未出现神经损伤并发症。结论微创Quadrant系统下TLIF手术治疗腰椎退变具有创伤小、出血少、恢复快、住院时间短、近期疗效好等优点。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of minimally invasive transmu[tifidus ap- proach by the Quadrant system for lumbar degenerative disease. Methods From Jan 2010 to Mar 2012,72 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases were divided into two groups and underwent different types of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Mininmally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF)group (33 cases)received minimally invasive treatment with DePuy Viper 1 system com- bined endoscopically assisted TLIF. Open TLIF group (39 cases) underwent traditional open TLIF surgery. The length of the cut,the blood loss,operation time and effect were observed and compared between the two groups. Results All cases had been followed up between 12-18 months,average of 15 months. There was no significant differences in operation time between the groups(P〉0.05). Sur- gical blood loss,surgical draining loss,hospital stay,analgesics use and dose (P〈0.01) were less in MIS-TLIFgroup. The scores of VAS and ODI in MIS-TLIDF group were less than those in Open TLIF group(P〈0.01 ). Conclusion The application of Quadrant system in Surgical treatment of lumbar degeneration,which has less injury,less blood loss,less hospital stay,and satisfied function recovery,is an effctive minimally invasive surgical method.
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2013年第1期22-25,共4页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
关键词 腰椎退行性疾病 多裂肌间隙 微创 经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术 lumbar degenerative diseases minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Park Y,Ha JW. Comparison of one-Level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach[J].Spine,2007,(05):537-543.doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256473.49791.f4.
  • 2Lawton CD,Smith ZA,Barnawi A. The surgical of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].Neuroscience,2011,(03):259-264.
  • 3Lee CK,Park JY,Zhang HY. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system:technical tips,and perioperative,radiologic and clinical outcomes[J].Korean Neurosurg Soc,2010,(03):219-224.
  • 4Adogwa O,Park SL,Bydon A. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:2-year assessment of narcotic use,return to work,disability of life[J].Spinal Disorder and Techniques,2011,(08):479-484.
  • 5高金亮,孙刚,刘新宇.腰椎管狭窄症的解剖学基础与病理机制研究[J].医学综述,2007,13(4):285-287. 被引量:23
  • 6范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 7Park P,Garton H J,Gala VC. Adjacent disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusjon:review of the literature[J].Spine,2004,(03):1938-1944.

二级参考文献34

  • 1于天泉,王义,刘昱,张进学,张德桂.侧隐窝狭窄的边界值[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(1):7-9. 被引量:28
  • 2吴闻文,侯树勋.动态CTM对腰椎管狭窄症的诊断意义[J].CT理论与应用研究(中英文),1995,4(2):22-24. 被引量:5
  • 3赵兴,范顺武.腰椎及腰骶椎融合术后邻近节段的退行性疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(10):618-621. 被引量:12
  • 4Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF):technical feasibility and initial results.J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18 Suppl:S1-6.
  • 5Roland M,Fairbank J.The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire.Spine,2000,25:3115-3124.
  • 6Hackenberg L,Halm H,Bullmann V,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.Eur Spine J,2005,14:551-558.
  • 7Hee HT,Castro FP Jr,Majd ME,et al.Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:analysis of complications and predictive factors.J Spinal Disord,2001,14:533-540.
  • 8Villavicencio AT,Burneikiene S,Bulsara KR,et al.Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability.J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19:92-97.
  • 9Ozgur BM,Yoo K,Rodriguez G,et al.Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).Eur Spine J,2005,14:887-894.
  • 10Jellema P,van der Windt DA,van der Horst HE,et al.Why is a treatment aimed at psychosocial factors not effective in patients with(sub)acute low back pain? Pain,2005,118:350-359.

共引文献75

同被引文献96

  • 1周跃,张超.内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的现状及存在的问题[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):248-249. 被引量:20
  • 2姜晓幸,费琴明,王晓峰.微创TLIF手术的手术方法和早期临床结果[J].中国临床医学,2006,13(4):642-644. 被引量:14
  • 3周跃,王健,初同伟,李长青,张正丰,王卫东,郑文杰.极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的微创外科治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(4):241-247. 被引量:72
  • 4丁宇,阮狄克,王鹏建,李景云,何勍.极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症临床特点及分型意义[J].脊柱外科杂志,2007,5(2):92-95. 被引量:9
  • 5Mao L,Chen GD,Xu XM,et al. Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion performed with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw[J]. Orthopedics ,2013,36(4) :489-493.
  • 6Kabins MB,Weinstein JN,Spratt KF,et al. Isolated L-L5 fu- sions using the variable serew placement system:unilateral versus bilateral[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1992,5( 1 ) :39-49.
  • 7Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH,et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion[J]. Spine, 2000, 25 (14) : 1843-1847.
  • 8Payer M. "Minimally invasive"|umbar spine surgery:a critical review[J]. Acta Neur-ochir (Wien) ,2011,153(7 ) : 1455-1459.
  • 9Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN,et al. Less invasive posterior fixation method fo-llowing transforaminal lumbar interbody fu- sion:a biomechanical analysis[J]. Spine,2006,6(1):78-85.
  • 10Sethi A,Muzumdar AM,Ingalhalikar A,et al. Biomechanical anal- ysis of a novel pos-terior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study[J]. Spine J,2011,11 (9): 863-869.

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部