期刊文献+

经皮微创新型锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的病例对照研究 被引量:31

Case-control study on minimally invasive percutaneous new plate osteosynthesis applied in proximal humerus fractures in elder patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价经皮微创新型锁定钢板内固定治疗老年性肱骨近端3、4部分骨折的临床意义。方法:2008年6月至2010年12月,采用锁定钢板内固定治疗老年肱骨近端3、4部分骨折98例,男43例,女55例;年龄65~84岁,平均(71.3±6.2)岁。47例采取经三角肌外侧入路,经皮微创新型肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定治疗(MIPPO组);51例采取三角肌胸大肌间隙入路,切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗(ORIF组)。记录患者的手术时间、术中出血量、伤口并发症、住院时间。术后应用Constant评分系统对肩关节进行功能评定。结果:96例患者均获随访,时间13~42个月,平均18.1个月,2例患者随访期内死亡。MIPPO组较ORIF组平均出血量减少125ml(P<0.05)。手术时间两组比较差异无统计学意义。平均住院时间MIPPO组较ORIF组缩短5.1d(P<0.05)。两组患者骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义。末次随访肩关节功能Constant评分两组比较差异无统计学意义,但并发症发生率MIPPO组低于ORIF组(P<0.05)。结论:经皮微创肱骨近端新型锁定钢板内固定具有术中出血少、术后患者恢复快和血运破坏少、并发症发生率低等优点,是治疗老年肱骨近端3、4部分骨折有效的方法。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical significance of minimally invasive percutaneous new plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) applied in three and four-part fractures of proximal humerus in elder patients. Methods:From June 2008 to December 2010,98 old patients with three and fourart fractures of proximal humerus were treated with locking plate osteosynthesis. There were 43 males and 55 females with an average age of (71.3 ± 6.2) years ranging from 65 to 84. Among them,47 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous new plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) through antrolateral transdeohoid approach, and meanwhile 51 cases were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) through a traditional deltopectoral approach. The operation time ,blood loss ,wound complications and hospital stay were recorded. The functional outcomes of the shoulder were assessed according to Constant score. Results: Ninety-six patients were followed up for 13 to 42 months (averaged 18.1 months),and 2 patients died during the follow-up period. The mean blood loss of the MIPPO group was lower than that of the ORIF group by 125 ml (P〈O.05). There was no difference in the operation time between two groups. But the MIPPO group had a slightly shorter hospital stay than the ORIF group (P〈0.05). All the fractures united clinically and radiologically. The difference of the mean healing time between two groups was not significant. Tile mean Constant score at final follow-up of two groups had no statistic difference. But the rate of complication of the MIPPO group was lower than that of the ORIF group (P〈0.05). Only 1 case of the MIPPO group had axillary nerve paralysis post-operatively, but 4 cases had slack internal fixation and 2 cases had avascular necrosis of the humeral head in the ORIF group. Conclusion: The technique of percutaneous insertion combined new locking plate internal fixation has the advantages of less blood loss ,rapid recovery ,less vascular damage, lower risk of complications and so on. It can effectively treat the proximal humerus three-and four-part fractures, especially to elder patients with osteoporosis.
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2013年第1期4-8,共5页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 骨折固定术 外科手术 微创性 病例对照研究 Proximal humeral fractures Fracture fixation,internal Surgical procedures,minimally invasive Case-control studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Court-Brown CM,Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures:a re- view [ J ]. Injury, 2006,37 (8) : 691-697.
  • 2Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder [J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1987, (214) : 160-164.
  • 3刘印文,匡勇,顾新丰,郑昱新,李志强,卫晓恩,卢伟达,詹红生,石印玉.手法闭合复位经皮微创固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(11):949-951. 被引量:18
  • 4Rderer G,Erhardt J,Kuster M,et al. Second generation locked plating of proximal humerus fractures-a prospective multicentre observational study[J]. Int Orthop,2011,35(3) :425-432.
  • 5Brunner F, Sommer C ,Bahrs C, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate:a prospective multicenter analysis [J ]. J Orthop Trau-ma,2009,23(3):163-172.
  • 6Stidkamp N,Bayer J,Hepp P,et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective,multicenter, observational study [J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009,91 (6):1320- 1328.
  • 7李素明,杨开锦,黄健.经皮钢板固定治疗老年性肱骨近端3、4部分骨折[J].中国骨伤,2010,23(4):298-301. 被引量:6
  • 8赵吉鹏,胡万坤,张秋林,林涧,周前,何建军,诸葛天瑜.有限切开经三角肌入路肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(2):155-157. 被引量:24
  • 9Gardner MJ,Voos JE,Wanich T,et al. Vascular implications of minimally invasive plating of proximal humerus fractures[J. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20 ( 9 ) : 602-607.
  • 10Gardner M J, Griffith MH, Dines JS, et ah The extended anterolater- al acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus [J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005, (434) : 123- 129.

二级参考文献22

  • 1金鸿宾.中国接骨学的走势和前景[J].中国骨伤,2005,18(2):65-66. 被引量:13
  • 2董福慧.“微创”骨伤科技术的制高点[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(1):1-2. 被引量:35
  • 3朱让腾,叶招明,应有荣,眭述平.肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折[J].中国骨伤,2006,19(5):304-305. 被引量:19
  • 4Palvanen M,Kannus P,Niemi S,et al.Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,442:87-92.
  • 5cerber C,Wemer CM,Vienne P.Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2004,86(6):848-855.
  • 6Constant CR,Murley AH.A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1987,(214):160-164.
  • 7Giannoudis PV,Schneider E.Principles of fixation of osteoporotic fractures.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2006,88(10):1272-1278.
  • 8Kubiak EN,Fulkerson E,Strauss E,et al.The evolution of locked plates.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2006,88(Suppl 4):189-200.
  • 9Siffri PC,Peindl RD,Coley ER,et al.Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture:comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.J Orthop Traunla,2006,20(8):547-554.
  • 10Siwach R,Singh R,Rohilla RK,et al.Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP)in elderly pmients with osteoporosis.J Orthop Trauma,2008,9(3):149-153.

共引文献43

同被引文献227

引证文献31

二级引证文献248

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部