《文选》编者问题的重新思考

Reflections on the Editorship of Wen Xuan

日本学者清水凯夫主张《文选》为刘孝绰所编,萧统并未具体主持编纂。此论点为学界所关注,《文选》编者问题遂渐成为《文选》研究的一个焦点问题。寻绎文献可知,清水先生这一论点源自对大陆学术风气的态度,未必是其真实主张;《文选》系萧统与刘孝绰等学士共同编纂,此可由原始文献的文本细读与分析加以佐证;《文选》的编纂不是孤立事件,是时代文学风尚递变的必然结果。

According to Shimizu Cave,a scholar of Japan,the editor of Wen Xuan is Liu Xiaochao,and Xiao Tong was not involved in the editing of the book.His view attracts the attention of the academic world.Thus the editorship becomes a research focus of Wen Xuan studies.Bibliographical review shows that Shimizu＇s view derived from his attitude to Chinese academic atmosphere and is not necessary his real claim.This book is co-edited by Xiao Tong and Liu Xiaochao,which can be supported by close reading and analysis of the original documents.The editing of Wen Xuan is not an isolated event,but the inevitable result of literary environment of the time.