行政证据与刑事证据衔接规范研究——基于刑事诉讼法第52条第2款的分析

On the Convergence Norms between Administrative Evidence and Criminal Evidence——on the Basis of Article52(2)in the 2012 Criminal Procedure Law

《刑事诉讼法》(2012年)在第52条第2款规定了行政证据和刑事证据衔接适用规范。该规范与以往的证据转化规则不同,是赋予行政证据以刑事证据能力的规范。对于"等证据材料"的理解,应当进行严格解释,将勘验、检查笔录以及部分现场笔录涵盖进来,而现行司法解释及有关规定将其范围扩大到鉴定意见、检验报告的做法是值得商榷的。在具体的适用过程中,审判机关是实质意义上的衔接适用主体,行政证据无需转化就可以直接适用,对行政证据自身合法性的审查应当依据行政法律、法规进行,而刑事证据规则也有其适用的空间。

The Criminal Procedure Law （2012） sets up a new regulation to link up administrative evidence and criminal evidence. However, this convergence norm, different from the previous evidence conversion rule, pro- vides the administrative evidence with the evidence competency like criminal evidence. We should take strict in- terpretations of ＂other evidentiary materials＂ including the writing records of inquisition and inspection and some part of on-the spot writing records. Wether or not expert opinion or inspection report can be included is question- able. In the judicial practice, the court is substantively the application subject. Administrative evidence can be di- rectly used without conversion. The legitimacy review of administrative evidence should be based on the administrative laws and regulations, and criminal evidence rules are also available to be used.