期刊文献+

某焦化场地苯并(a)芘污染空间分布范围预测的不确定性分析 被引量:20

Uncertainty analysis on spatial distribution prediction of BaP in a coking plant site
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对目前我国大型工业污染场地调查和污染范围确定过程中的不确定性,以我国某焦化场地为研究对象,选择场地中的特征性污染物苯并(a)芘,分别采用反距离加权模型、Johnson数据正态变换后的普通克里格模型及数据拆分后的组合预测模型,参照北京市污染场地土壤筛选值标准,将大于规定标准0.4mg·kg-1的区域界定为污染范围,系统阐述空间插值模型对污染范围界定结果的不确定性影响.结果显示,3种插值模型界定的污染范围分别占场地总面积的70.15%、44.78%和57.06%,数据拆分后的组合预测模型插值精度最高,插值结果能较真实地反映场地实际污染情况,通过创建的预测标准误差图显示,预测标准误差大的区域主要集中在污染场地中样点较为稀疏的右上位置和有高值点的中下部区域.本研究结果对分析污染范围界定结果的不确定性和修复治理范围的确定提供了重要参考. Uncertainty in site investigation and the determination of contamination boundary at large-scale contaminated sites is a critical issue in China. In order to test the influence of different prediction models on the determination of contamination boundary in a coking plant contaminated by benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), three spatial interpolation models, Inverse Distance Weighting model (IDW), Johnson′s ordinary lognormal kriging model (OLKM), and Combination Prediction Model (CPM), were employed to compare their efficiencies and precisions in determining site contamination boundary. A recommended value 0.4 mg · kg^-1 for BaP was used as the reference standard based on the Beijing Screening Levels for Soil Environmental Risk Assessment of Sites. The Results showed that the contamination areas calculated by IDW, OLKM, and CPM were 70.15%, 44.78% and 57.06%, respectively. The CPM was found to be more accurate than the other two models in predicting the actual pollution situations of the contaminated site. The area on the top-right corner of the site with less sampling points and the area in the mid-bottom part with high levels of contamination showed the largest standard errors based on the prediction standard errors map. This study gives useful references for dealing with uncertainty in determining remediation boundary of contaminated sites.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期587-593,共7页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 环境保护公益性行业科研专项经费项目(No.201009015) 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.40901249)~~
关键词 污染场地 污染范围 不确定性 多环芳烃 contaminated site pollution scope uncertainty analysis PAHs
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Bargaoui Z K,Chebbi A. Comparison of two kriging interpolation methods applied to spatiotemporal rainfall[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,(1/2):56-73.
  • 2Campbell J E,Moen J C,Ney R A. Comparison of regression coefficient and GIS-based methodologies for regional estimates of forest soil carbon stocks[J].Environmental Pollution,2008,(02):267-273.
  • 3陈道贵,胡乃联,李国清.区域化变量非正态分布的稳健性[J].北京科技大学学报,2009,31(4):412-417. 被引量:9
  • 4Emery X. Uncertainty modeling and spatial prediction by multiGaussian kriging:Accounting for an unknown mean value[J].Computers & Geosciences,2008,(11):1431-1442.
  • 5Franco C,Soares A,Delgado J. Geostatistical modeling of heavy metal contamination in the top soil of Guadiamar river margins using a stochastic simulation technique[J].Geoderma,2006,(3/4):852-864.
  • 6Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation[M].New York:Oxford Univeristy Press,1997.158-160.
  • 7Goovaerts P,Trinh H,Demond A. Geostatistical modeling of the spatial distribution of soil dioxins in the vicinity of an incinerator:Theory and application to Midland,Michigan[J].Environmental Sciemce & Technology,2008,(10):3648-3654.
  • 8郭观林,王世杰,施烈焰,李慧颖,韩春媚,谷庆宝,曹云者,李发生.某废弃化工场地VOC/SVOC污染土壤健康风险分析[J].环境科学,2010,31(2):397-402. 被引量:49
  • 9郭观林,王翔,关亮,颜增光,谷庆宝,李发生.基于特定场地的挥发/半挥发有机化合物(VOC/SVOC)空间分布与修复边界确定[J].环境科学学报,2009,29(12):2597-2605. 被引量:21
  • 10Juang K W,Lee D Y. A comparison of three kriging methods using auxiliary variables in heavy-metal contaminated soils[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1998,(02):355-363.doi:10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020016x.

二级参考文献83

共引文献396

同被引文献297

引证文献20

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部