期刊文献+

氨磺必利与氯氮平对阴性症状为主的精神分裂症患者临床疗效及生活质量的对照研究 被引量:76

Comparative study on efficacy and quality of life of amisulpride and clozapine in schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨氨磺必利与氯氮平对以阴性症状为主的精神分裂症的疗效及对生活质量的影响.方法 对70例以阴性症状为主的精神分裂症患者,按抛币法随机分两组,分别用氨磺必利与氯氮平治疗,疗程12周.于治疗前及治疗后1,2,4,8,12周末采用阴性症状量表(SANS)、简明精神病量表(BPRS)评定临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定药物副反应,治疗前及治疗后采用生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)评定生活质量.结果 最后一次评定,氨磺必利组BPRS总分降至(30.68 ±4.62)分,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);氯氮平组BPRS总分降至(31.31 ±4.78)分,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).两组间疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).经12周治疗,氨磺必利组SANS的情感淡漠、思维贫乏、意志缺乏、兴趣社交缺乏、注意障碍各因子分为(12.31 ±4.43)分、(9.66±3.07)分、(8.91±2.56)分、(10.29±2.68)分、(5.58±1.43)分;氯氮平组分别为(14.62 ±4.27)分、(9.32±2.81)分、(8.22±2.60)分、(9.54±2.67)分、(6.62±1.59)分.两组患者阴性症状的改善较治疗前均有显著改善(P <0.01),但氨磺必利组在情感淡漠及注意障碍因子方面的疗效优于氯氮平(P<0.05).氨磺必利组和氯氮平组GQOLI-74的物质生活、躯体健康、心理健康和社会功能四个维度得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者生活质量较治疗前均有显著改善(P<0.01),但在躯体健康、心理健康和社会功能三维度,氨磺必利优于氯氮平(P<0.01).氯氮平组副作用比氨磺必利组多.结论 氨磺必利对以阴性症状为主的精神分裂症有肯定的疗效,与氯氮平相当.但在改善情感淡漠、注意障碍和提高生活质量方面优于氯氮平,安全性更高. Objective To investigate the influence on efficacy and quality of life of amisulpride in schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms.Methods Seventy cases of schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms were randomly assigned to amisulpride group and clozapine group for 12weeks.The clinical efficacy and side effects were evaluated with SANS,BPRS and TESS before and 1,2,4,8,12 weeks after treatment respectively. GQOLI-74 were used to evaluate the patients' quality of life before and after drug administration.Results For the last assessment,the score of BPRS decrease to 30.68 ±4.62 in amisulpride group,was significantly lower than the beginning(P〈0.01 ) ; the score of BPRS decrease to 31.31 ±4.78 in clozapine group,was significantly lower than the beginning (P 〈 0.01 ).Two groups showed similar effects,with no significance.12weeks after treatment,the scores of emotional dull,poverty of thought,volition abulia,interest-social lack,attention dysfunction in amisulpride group were 12.31 ± 4.43,9.66 ± 3.07,8.91 ± 2.56,10.29 ± 2.68,5.58 ± 1.43 ; and the scores of emotional dull,poverty of thought,volition abulia,interest-social lack,attention dysfunction in clozapine group were 14.62 ± 4.27,9.32 ± 2.81,8.22 ± 2.60,9.54 ± 2.67,6.62 ± 1.59,and the efficacy of amisulpride in emotional dull and attention dysfunction were better than those of clozapine.And the scores of material life,physical function,psychological function,social function in amisulpride group were not higher than those in clozapine group(P〉 0.05).And the scores of four domains in GQOLI-74 had been improved significantly in two groups(P〈0.01).The domains of physical function,psychological function,and social function in amisulpride was superior to clozapine(P〈0.01).The side effects were more in clozapine group than those in amisulpride group.Conclusion Amisulpride is as effective as clozapine for the treatment of schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms,but it has more advantage than clozapine to improve emotional dull,attention dysfunction and quality of life in schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第8期705-708,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 氨磺必利 氯氮平 精神分裂症 阴性症状 疗效 生活质量 对照研究 Amisulpride Clozapine Schizophrenia Negative symptoms Efficacy Quality of life Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 2曲鸿儒,高艳杰,毛富强,刘霞,陈玉辉.药物联合分散内观认知疗法对男性偏执型精神分裂症康复期疗效观察[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2012,21(1):53-56. 被引量:20
  • 3张明园.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2003.35-39.
  • 4李凌江 杨德森.生活质量综合评定问卷-74.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:88-100.
  • 5沈渔邨.精神病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:406.
  • 6刘协和,李涛.牛津精神病学.成都:四川大学出版社,2010,361.
  • 7骆宏.精神分裂症与生活质量[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),2002,29(3):156-157. 被引量:86
  • 8Meltzer HY,Burnett S,Bastani B,et al.Effects of six months of clozapine treatment on the quality of life of chronic schizophrenic patients.Hosp Comm Psychiatry,1990,41:892-897.
  • 9Xiberas X,Martinot JL,Mallet L,et al.In vivo extrastriatal and striatal 1D2 dopamine receptor blockade by amisulpride in schizophrenia.J Chin Psychophramaco1,2001,21:207-214.
  • 10Komossa K,Rummel-Kluge C,Hunger H,et al.Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010,17:CD006654.

二级参考文献39

  • 1杨长虹,郭平,郭华.精神分裂症患者子女行为问题及其相关因素探讨[J].中国行为医学科学,2004,13(5):544-545. 被引量:3
  • 2赵贵芳,王延祜,管国涛,邱惠敏,刘金同,唐济生,王善松,冯健,宋深刚,李庆荣,张伟,李萍,乔学云,郑玉英,崔爱军,朱成友,孙呈勇.精神分裂症患者的12~16岁子女行为问题的初步调查[J].中华精神科杂志,2005,38(3):160-160. 被引量:3
  • 3王滨,罗伟.心理弹性发展的研究进展及评述[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2007,47(5):127-130. 被引量:54
  • 4Knapp M,Mangalore R,Simon J. The global costs of schizophrenia[J].Schizophrenia Bulletin,2004.279-293.doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007078.
  • 5Lazarus RS. From psychological stress to the emotions:a history of changing outlooks[J].Ann Rev Psycho,1993.1-21.
  • 6Masten AS. Ordinary Magic:Lessons from research on resilience in human development[J].Educ Can,2009.28-32.
  • 7Agaibi c,Wilson J. Trauma,PTSD,and resilience:a review of the literature[J].TRAUMA VIOLENCE AND ABUSE,2005,(3):195.doi:10.1177/1524838005277438.
  • 8KatschnigH,etal. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica . 2000
  • 9KasckowJWetal. PsychiatrRes . 2001
  • 10Priebe S,et al. Psychiatr Med . 2000

共引文献3131

同被引文献606

引证文献76

二级引证文献540

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部