期刊文献+

大学英语课程教学质量多元评价体系探究——以重庆科技学院为例 被引量:25

A Study on the Construction of Multi-Evaluation System of Teaching Quality for College English Course:A Case Study of Chongqing Science and Technology University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学英语课程教学质量多元评价体系是指采用多种有效的技术手段和评价方法,在非结构化的教学情境中评价学生学习学习状态和学习成效、教师教学过程和教学效果的一系列方法。它以现代质量管理理论、建构主义和多元智能理论为理论基础,以学生和教师的发展为根本目标,以教学过程为主线,以"评教"和"评学"为双内核。本文运用语料库和实证研究的方法,结合重庆科技学院大学英语课程改革的标准和要求,构建了富有现实针对性的大学英语课程教学质量评价体系,为大学英语课程教学改革背景下的课堂教学质量评价提供参考。 Multi-evaluation System of Teaching Quality for College English Course is a series of methods adopted to evaluate students' learning state and learning effect as well as teachers' teaching process and the teaching effect in unstructured teaching situation through varieties of effective technical means and evaluation methods. Based on Modern Quality Manage- ment Theory, Constructivism Educational Theory and Multi-intelligence Theory, it treats the development of the students and teachers as the fundamental goal, the teaching process as the main line and evaluation of teaching and learning evaluation for double kernel. With corpus and empirical study, a practical and specific evaluation system of teaching quality for college English course is constructed with a case study of Chongqing Science and Technology University, providing references for the teaching quality evaluation under the background of college English teaching reform.
作者 赵应吉
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2012年第6期169-173,共5页 Foreign Languages and Literature
基金 重庆市教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度课题"新建本科理工院校大学英语课堂教学质量多元评价体系研究与实践"(2012-GX-171)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 大学英语课程 教学质量多元评价体系 教学改革 个案研究 college English course multi-evaluation system of teaching quality teaching reform case study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Brooks,J.G,M.G.Brooks. In Search of Understanding:The Case for Constructivist Classrooms[M].Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve,1999.
  • 2Gardner H. Frames of Mind:The Theory of Multiple Intelligences[M].New York:Basic Books Inc,1983.60.
  • 3Jonassen,D,Peck,K,B.Wilson. Learning with Technology:A Constructivist Perspective[M].NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall,1999.
  • 4Osborne,R.J,M.C.Wittrock. Learning Science:A Generative Process[M].Hamilton:University of Waikato,2006.
  • 5胡建平,魏建,杨宗栋,周洁.模糊综合评判法在教师教学质量评估中的应用[J].上海工程技术大学学报,2005,19(1):71-75. 被引量:11
  • 6霍华德?加德纳.多元智能[M]北京:新华出版社,2004.
  • 7教育部高等教育司.大学英语课程教学要求[M]上海:上海外语教育出版社,20077-8.
  • 8王志丽,李利红.多元智能理论视角下的课堂教学评价革新[J].牡丹江教育学院学报,2011(5):61-62. 被引量:6
  • 9王笃勤.真实性评价--从理论到实践[M]北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2007.
  • 10杨志坚.2000新版ISO9000国际标准术语手册[M]北京:国防工业出版社,20047.

二级参考文献11

共引文献27

同被引文献222

引证文献25

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部