期刊文献+

手助腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的优势与评价 被引量:16

Virtues and evaluation of hand-assisted laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 手辅助腹腔镜手术作为腹腔镜手术的重要组成部分,近年来在直肠癌根治手术中的应用越来越多。虽然其手术步骤与全腹腔镜手术大概一致,但由于腹腔内有灵敏触觉的手存在,因此兼顾了微创腹腔镜和开放手术的优势。手辅助腹腔镜直肠癌手术具有学习曲线短、中转开腹率低、手术时间短、适应证广等优点,并且可以快速有效控制出血等术中意外的发生,提高了手术的安全性。手虽然给腹腔镜直肠癌手术带来许多便利,但同时也会占据腹腔内的有限空间,造成腹腔内气腹严密性减低,术者的辅助手易疲劳等缺点。 Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), which allows a surgeon to put hands into the abdominal cavity through a special hand port while maintaining the pneumoperitoneum, has been proposed as an useful alternative in treating rectal cancers. Combined application of hand-assisted operation and conventional techniques of laparoscopic surgery has facilitated the operative procedures with preservation of tactile sensation, which is usually lacking in conventional laparoscopic procedures. It also has improved the eye-to-hand coordination, while allowing hands to be used for blunt dissection and permitting a rapid control of unexpected intraoperative bleeding. The above factors could contribute to a significant reduction of operative time, with a short learning curve, a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and wide indications. Moreover, HALS provides hybrid procedures with advantages of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery. Nevertheless, the defects of HALS in rectal surgery include fatigue of hands, occupancy in a narrow pelvic cavity, and descending of abdominal gas-tightness.
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2012年第2期11-14,共4页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 直肠结肠切除术 重建性 Rectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Proctocolectomy, restorative
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Chung CC,Ng DC,Tsang WW. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy:a randomized controlled trial[J].Annals of Surgery,2007,(05):728-733.
  • 2Liu FL,Lin JJ,Ye F. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus the open approach in curative resection of rectal cancer[J].Journal of International Medical Research,2010,(03):916-922.
  • 3Osarogiagbon RU,Ogbeide O,Ogbeide E. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy compared with open colectomy in a nontertiary care setting[J].Clinical Colorectal Cancer,2007,(08):588-592.
  • 4Marcello PW,Fleshman JW,Milsom JW. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs.laparoscopic colorectal surgery:a multicenter,prospective,randomized trial[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum,2008,(06):818-826,discussion826-828.
  • 5Sonoda T,Pandey S,Trencheva K. Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons,2009,(01):62-66.
  • 6Polle SW,van Berge Henegouwen MI,Slors JF. Total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy:are there advantages compared with the open and hand-assisted approaches[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum,2008,(05):541-548.
  • 7Tjandra JJ,Chan MK,Yeh CH. Laparoscopic-vs.hand-assisted ultralow anterior resection:a prospective study[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum,2008,(01):26-31.
  • 8Stein S,Whelan RL. The controversy regarding hand-assisted colorectal resection[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2007,(12):2123-2126.
  • 9Aalbers AG,Biere SS,van Berge Henegouwen MI. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Surgical Endoscopy,2008,(08):1769-1780.
  • 10Roslani AC,Koh DC,Tsang CB. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy versus standard laparoscopic colectomy:a cost analysis[J].Colorectal Disease,2009,(05):496-501.

同被引文献162

引证文献16

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部