期刊文献+

不同权力者人际敏感性的差异 被引量:13

Differences of Interpersonal Sensitivity Between High-power People and Low-power People
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨两种实验条件下不同权力者的人际敏感性差异。方法:实验一采用3(角色扮演启动权力:高权力组/低权力组/控制组)×2(性别:男/女)被试间实验设计对206名大学生进行人际敏感性测验。实验二对某企业91名高、低权力员工进行人际敏感性测验。结果:实验一:角色扮演的主效应显著,高权力组人际敏感性得分显著高于低权力组;性别的主效应、角色扮演和性别的交互效应均不显著。实验二:权力的主效应显著,高权力组人际敏感性得分显著高于低权力组得分;权力和个人权力感的交互作用接近显著,简单主效应显示,高个人权力感的高权力者人际敏感性显著高于高个人权力感的低权力者。结论:在角色扮演任务和实际工作情境中高权力者比低权力者更具有人际敏感性。 Objective: To explore the differences of interpersonal sensitivity between high-power people and low-power people in two experimental conditions. Methods: In Experiment, 1,206 college participants in either a high- or low-power position or control condition interacted; In Experiment 2, 91 enterprise employees was measured by empathic accuracy paradigm. Results: In Experiment 1, A 3(leaders, control vs. assistants)×2(male vs. female) ANOVA yielded a significant main effect on interpersonal sensitivity, with high-power people more interpersonally sensitive than low-power people. There was no significant gender main effect, and no significant interaction effect. In Experiment 2, A 2 (high-power vs. low-power)×2(male vs. female)×2(high-personal sense of power vs. lowpersonal sense of power) ANOVA showed a significant main effect on interpersonal sensitivity, with high-power people more interpersonally sensitive than low-power people. There was edge significant interaction effect between power and personal sense of power. Conclusion: High-power individuals are more interpersonally sensitive than low-power individuals in the role-playing and in real life.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期62-65,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31171003) 湖南省教育厅重点研究项目(11A076)
关键词 权力 人际敏感性 共情精确性 Power Interpersonal sensitivity Empathic accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1张珊明,钟毅平,罗伏生,陈芸.人际敏感性的概念及其测量[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(5):606-609. 被引量:7
  • 2Snodgrass SE. Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,(01):154-158.
  • 3Kenny DA,Horner C,Kashy,DA. Consensus at zero acquaintance:Replication,behavioral cues,and stability[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,(01):88-97.
  • 4Ickes W,Stinson L,Bissonnette V. Naturalistic social cognition:Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,(04):730-742.
  • 5Overbeck JR,Park B. When power does not corrupt:Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,(04):549-565.
  • 6Schmid Mast M,Jonas K,Hall JA. Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity:The phenomenon and its why and when[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2009,(05):835-850.
  • 7Galinsky AD,Magee JC,Inesi ME. Power and perspectives not taken[J].Psychological Science,2006,(12):1068-1074.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x.
  • 8Kenny DA,Snook A,Boucher EM. Interpersonal sensitivity,status,and stereotype accuracy[J].Psychological Science,2010,(12):1735-1739.
  • 9林怡秀;李怡青.非语言敏感度:权力差异与不同社会角色期待的效果探讨[J]教育与心理研究,2011(01):55-77.
  • 10Smith PK,Jostmann NB,Galinsky AD. Lacking power impairs executive functions[J].Psychological Science,2008,(05):441-447.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Costanzo M, Archer D. Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1989, 13(4): 225-245.
  • 2Snodgrass SE. Further effects of role versus gender on inter- personal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 1992, 62(1): 154-158.
  • 3Kenny DA, Homer C, Kashy DA, et al. Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62(1): 88-97.
  • 4Ickes W, Stinson L, Bissonnette V, et al. Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59(4): 730-742.
  • 5Boucher EM, Hancock JT, Dunham PJ. Interpersonal sensi- tivity in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations. Media Psychology, 2008, 11:235-258.
  • 6Kenny DA, Snook A, Boucher EM, et al. Interpersonal sen- sitivity, status, and stereotype accuracy. Psychological Sci- ence, 2010, 21(12): 1735-1739.
  • 7林怡秀,李怡青.非语言敏感度:权力差异与不同社会角色期待的效果探讨.教育与心理研究,2011,34(1):55-77.
  • 8Penton-Voak IS, Pound N,Little AC, et al. Personality jud- gments from natural and composite facial images: More evi- dence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception. Social Cognition, 2006, 24(5): 607-640.
  • 9Pound N, Penton-Voak IS, Brown WM. Facial symmetry is positively associated with self-reported extraversion. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43 (6): 1572- 1582.
  • 10Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B. A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analysis of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 2011, 25(3): 225-238.

共引文献6

同被引文献219

引证文献13

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部