期刊文献+

抑郁症患者治疗前后归因方式的比较 被引量:5

Attribution Style of Patients with Depression before and after Treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索抑郁症患者治疗后归因方式的变化。方法选取62名住院抑郁症患者,在接受常规药物治疗前后进行抑郁自评量表(SDS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和归因方式问卷(ASQ)的测评。同时选取58名无抑郁病史者作为对照组,测量抑郁自评量表(SDS)和归因方式问卷(ASQ)。结果①抑郁症患者的抑郁水平与ASQ得分相关显著(SDS,r=-0.54,P<0.01;HAMD,r=-0.38,P<0.01);②抑郁症患者接受药物治疗后,抑郁状况显著改善(SDS,t=21.43,P<0.01;HAMD,t=28.19,P<0.01);③抑郁症组治疗后ASQ得分有所提高,但未达到显著水平(t=-1.62,P>0.05)。结论抑郁症患者的负性归因方式在治疗后有所改善,但改善不明显,治疗后与对照组差异依然显著。归因方式并非抑郁症的伴随症状,而是抑郁者的一种相对稳定的且具有可变性的类特质。 Objective By comparison with the control group,to explore the change of attribution styles of patients with depression after treatment.Methods A total of 62 hospitalized patients with depression were selected before and after the regular medication,and evaluated with the Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS),Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD)and the Attribution Style Questionnaire(ASQ).58 people with no history of depression as a control group were evaluated with SDS and ASQ.Results ①Depression were related significantly to ASQ scores(SDS,r=-0.54,P0.01;HAMD,r=-0.38,P0.01).②After treatment,depression was improved significantly(SDS,t=21.43,P0.01;HAMD,t=28.19,P0.01).③ASQ total score was increased after treatment,however,no significant difference between pretest and posttest(t=-1.62,P0.05).Conclusion The negative attribution style of patients with depression doesn't significant improvement after treatment.There still remains significant differences with control group after treatment.Attribution style is not a associated symptoms of depression,but a relatively stable and variable trait-like.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第1期10-13,共4页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目"十种心理咨询与心理治疗技术的规范与示范研究"(项目编号2009BAI77B07)
关键词 抑郁症 住院患者 归因方式 类特质 Depression Hospitalized patients Attribution style Trait-like
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Rios M,Fan G,Gekete C. Conditional deletion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the postnatal brain leads to obesity and hyperactivity[J].Molecular Endocrinology,2001,(10):1748-1757.
  • 2汪向东;王希林;马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[J]中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):220-223.
  • 3王纯,张宁.归因方式问卷的初步修订[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(5):470-471. 被引量:59
  • 4Tseng Kuang-Pei,Chang Sue-Hwang. The role of attributional style,noncontingency,and uncontrollability on depression among college students[J].Chinese Journal of Psychology,1998,(01):33-53.
  • 5Dieser Rodney,Ruddell Edward. Effect of attribution retraining during therapeutic recreation on attributions and explanatory styles of adolescent with depression[J].Therapeutic Recreation Journal,2002,(01):35-47.
  • 6张宁,王纯.大学生抑郁自评高分者的团体归因训练[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(4):229-231. 被引量:13
  • 7Green-Emrich Anne,Altmaier Elizabeth M. Attribution retraining as a structured group counselingintervention[J].Journal of Counseling and Development,1991,(04):351-355.
  • 8Alloy L B,Abramson L Y,Francis E L. Do negative cognitive styles confer vulnerability to depression[J].American Psychological Society,1999,(04):128-132.
  • 9王纯,张亚林,张宁,张婕,季伟华,李箕君.团体归因治疗对抑郁症、焦虑症、强迫症患者的症状及心理社会功能的效果[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(3):398-400. 被引量:8
  • 10Cook P F. Causal attributions in psychotherapy[J].Dissertation Abstracts International Section B:The Sciences and Engineering,2000,(3-B):1629.

二级参考文献31

共引文献74

同被引文献57

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部