期刊文献+

第二产程胎心监护图形与新生儿结局的关系 被引量:7

Clinical Impacts of Nonstress Test during Second Stage of Labor on Perinatal Outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨第二产程胎心监护图形与新生儿结局的关系,分析各类异常图形的临床意义。方法对2011年10月—2012年3月待产的2 848例产妇的临床资料进行回顾性分析,选择第二产程胎心监护出现Ⅱ类、Ⅲ类图形的423例产妇为观察组,随机选择同时期200例第二产程为Ⅰ类图形的产妇为对照组,观察组根据胎心监护图形不同分为7个亚组,分别与对照组脐动脉血pH值、第二产程时间、低Apgar评分(≤7分)、新生儿窒息的情况比较。结果观察组除早期减速和延长减速亚组外,其余各亚组脐动脉血pH值均不同程度地低于对照组(P<0.01);观察组除延长减速亚组外,其余各亚组第二产程时间均较对照组缩短(P<0.01);观察组除早期减速和延长减速亚组外,其余各亚组低Apgar评分患儿比例均高于对照组(P<0.01);观察组中基线异常、正弦型、晚期减速亚组新生儿窒息率高于对照组(P<0.01)。结论第二产程连续胎心监护中出现Ⅱ类、Ⅲ类图形能早期提示胎儿宫内窘迫,医务人员需及时准确处理,从而降低新生儿窒息率。 Objective To explore the clinical impacts of nonstress test (NST) during the second stage of labor on perinatal outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis based on 2 848 expectant mothers from October 2011 to March 2012 was carried out. Of the total, 423 patients, whose NST results on the second stage of labor were found to be type Ⅱ or Ⅲ, were taken as case group, in which there were 7 sub-groups based on different NST results, while those with NST results of type I (n=200) during the same time period as control group. Clinical data, mainly the perinatal outcomes of two groups were collected for comparison. Results There were significant differences of umbilical arterial blood pH values, delivery time as well as low Apgar score among sub-case groups and control group (P〈0.01). The neonatal asphyxia rate in sub-groups of abnormal baseline, sinusoidally and late deceleration significantly differed from that of control group (P〈0.01). Conclusion Consecutive monitoring the type Ⅱ or Ⅲ NST results during the second stage of labor would be helpful for early identification of fetal distress.Timely and accurate managements could reduce the rate of neonatal asphyxia.
出处 《护理学报》 2013年第3期47-49,共3页 Journal of Nursing(China)
关键词 第二产程 胎心监护 胎儿窘迫 新生儿窒息 second stage of labor nonstress test fetal distress neonatal asphyxia
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1杨慧霞,武海荣.关于2008年美国儿童健康与人类发展研究院电子胎儿监护定义、解释的解读[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(2):81-83. 被引量:30
  • 2APGAR V. A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant[ J ]. Curt Res Anesth Analg, 1953, 32 (4):260-267.
  • 3Finster M, Wood M. The Apgar Score Has Survived the Test of Time[J ]. Anesthesiology, 2005, 102(4):855-857.
  • 4陈自励,何锐智,彭倩,郭可瑜,张玉琼,袁惠华.新生儿窒息诊断标准改进的临床研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(3):167-172. 被引量:73
  • 5Freeman R K. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring[M]. Baltimore: Williams& Wilkins USA,1981:64-65, 69-70.
  • 6任长慧,许圣菊,亓效香.第二产程胎心监护异常图形对新生儿预后的影响[J].泰山医学院学报,2008,29(7):530-532. 被引量:2
  • 7CunninghamFG.威廉姆斯产科学[M].21版.段涛,丰有吉主译.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2006:990.
  • 8Murata Y, Martin C B Jr, Ikenoue T, et al. Fetal Heart Rate Accelerations and Late Decelerations during the Course of Intrauterine Death in Chronically Catheterized Rhesus Mon- keys[ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 144(2):218-223.
  • 9程志厚,宋树良,主编.胎儿电子监护学[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.28—29.
  • 10刘淑芸,刘饼.第二产程胎心监护异常处理及临床意义[J].中国妇产科杂志,2002,37(8):462-464.

二级参考文献51

  • 1任雪梅,张秀云.胎心监护对脐带缠绕早期诊断的价值[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(1):26-26. 被引量:5
  • 2姚敏卿.脐血血气分析、胎心监护、Apgar评分联合监测新生儿窒息[J].国际医药卫生导报,2006,12(23):12-14. 被引量:11
  • 3Macones GA, Hankins GDV, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Workshop Report on Electronic Fetal Monitoring--Update on Definitions, Interpretation, and Research Guidelines[ J]. Obstet Gynecol ,2008,112:661-666.
  • 4熊正爱.妇产科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:128-129.
  • 5Phelan JP, Ahn MO. Fetal heart rate observations in 300 term brain-damaged infants. J Matern Fetal Investig,1998,8:1-5.
  • 6Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Antsaklis A, et al. Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1995,173:1021-1024.
  • 7Julian T, Parer MD PhD, Tekoa King , et al . Whither fetal heart rate monitoring ? Current problems in obstetrics. Gynecolo Fertility,1999,22:156-171.
  • 8Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, et al. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a META-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol,1995,85:149-155.
  • 9Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Peterson HB . Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update. Obstet Gynecol,1995,86:613-620.
  • 10Parer JT. Handbook of Fetal heart rate monitoring. 2nd ed. Philadelphia : Saunders,1997.286.

共引文献170

同被引文献81

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部