摘要
留置权属于广义的民事自助行为范畴,我国现行法律制度将留置权界定为物权属性,限制了留置权保障债权实现功能的有效发挥。未来民法典应比照《德国民法典》的相关规定,在"债法总则编"中增设债权留置,适度剥离物权留置与债权留置,整合与重构"民商合一"体例下留置权的一般化条款与特殊性规则,使债权人留置权在法律制度上得以有效的引导与规范。
Lien belongs to the category of civil self-help in a broad sense. China' s present legal system defines lien as real right, which would limit the efficiency and effectiveness of lien guaranteeing creditor' s rights. In the future, with reference to Germany' s Civil Code, China' s Civil Code should add lien to the General Principles of Obligation Law, properly separate lien of real right from that of creditor' s right, integrate and reconstruct the general and specific provi- sions in the system of "unified civil and commercial law", and effectively regulate creditor's lien in the legal system.
出处
《天津商业大学学报》
2013年第1期63-68,共6页
Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
基金
2010年教育部人文社会科学研究项目"私权自我实现之维一民事自助行为制度化"(10YJC820117)的阶段成果之一
关键词
自助行为
商事留置权
民法典
self-help remedy
commercial lien
Civil Code