生产与承认——马克思生产劳动范式与霍耐特承认理论的根本分歧

Production and Recognition——The Fundamental Differences Between Marx's Productive Labor Paradigm and Honneth's Theory of Recognition

随着古典承认理论在当代的复兴,某些现代西方学者提出"用承认理论拯救马克思"的口号,借承认理论向马克思哲学发起新的批判,从而使得承认问题成为马克思主义和非马克思主义开展思想斗争的新的焦点。这个焦点的中心论题是围绕着马克思的生产劳动范式的"承认解读"而展开的,其代表人物则是霍耐特。在霍氏看来,马克思的早期著作中隐含着一种对"为承认而斗争"的理解,但在其成熟时期的著作中,马克思很快就用一种功利主义的社会冲突模式取代了因相互承认关系的破坏而产生的道德冲突逻辑。这种解读模式显然是霍耐特误读马克思的生产劳动概念的结果。

With the revival of the classical theory of recognition today, some modern Western scholars believe that the theory of recognition should be applied to save Marx. They attempt to use the theory of there was a profound interpretation of the ＂struggle for recognition＂ in Marx＇s early writings; However, Marx soon abandoned this interpretation and turned to a utilitarian interpretation mode in his later writings. This interpretation is clearly a result of Honneth＇s misreading of Marx＇s concept of productive labor.