期刊文献+

论威廉斯个人完整性的道德合理性危机——作为功利主义的辩护

On the Moral Rationality Crisis of Williams′ Concept on Integrity——As a Defence of Utilitarianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 威廉斯的个人完整性概念以第一人称的视角、基于品格决定论的思维和回顾式责任反思的道德态度对功利主义主张的功利原则、道德规范和道德责任要求进行了批判。对完整性概念在道德上的根本质疑在于威廉斯要求维护的品格的完整性在道德价值上并不符合完善性要求,从而缺乏一种道德的合理性基础;这不仅是完整性概念道德合理性危机的根源,也奠定了功利主义的辩护基础:功利主义以一种基于整体和面向未来的思维导向,为人们提供了一种具有道德合理性内核的实践智慧。个人完整性对功利主义的启发性意义在于如何对待人的多样性特征在功利主义中的表现方式,从而建立一种个体对整体的信任。 From the first person perspective and on the basis of character-oriented theory and moral attitude of rethinking responsibility,William′s concept of individual integrity has imposed criticism on the utility principle,moral norms and responsibility of which utilitarian claims.The fundamental doubt of the integrity concept on morality lies in that the character integrity which William insists does not match the requirements of integrity,thereby lacking a reasonable basis of morality.Meanwhile,this not only constitutes the origin of the moral rationality crisis of integrity,but also lays a solid foundation for the utilitarianism: using a thinking direction on a basis of entirety and facing future,utilitarianism has provided mankind a practical wisdom with the core of moral rationality.The instructive significance of individual integrity to utilitarianism lies in the way to treat the manifestation mode of the mankind′s diversity on utilitarianism to establish a kind of reliability of an individual toward the entirety.
作者 张轶瑶
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期20-25,共6页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 完整性 价值完善 功利主义 整体性 未来性 integrity perfection of moral value utilitarianism holistic future
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Richard B. Brandt. "The Real and Alleged Problems of Utilitarianism", The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1993.
  • 2晋运锋.当代西方功利主义研究述评[J].哲学动态,2010(10):57-62. 被引量:13
  • 3毛兴贵.伯纳德·威廉斯对功利主义的批判[J].中国人民大学学报,2010,24(3):38-45. 被引量:14
  • 4Bernard Williams. "A Critique of Utilitarianism". in J · J · C · Smart and Bernard Williams. Utilitarianism. For and Against, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press,1973.
  • 5Robert Noggle. "Integrity, the Self, and Desire - Based Accounts of the Good", Philosophical Studies, 1999, 96 (12).
  • 6J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams. Utilitarianism. Fors and Against, Cambridge . Cambridge University Press.
  • 7伯纳德·威廉斯.《道德运气》,上海,上海译文出版社,2007.
  • 8Bernard Williams. Making Sense of Humanity, Cam- bridge . Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 9Thomas Nagel. Mortal Questions, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 10M.纽斯鲍姆,唐文明(译).悲剧与正义——纪念伯纳德·威廉姆斯[J].世界哲学,2007(4):22-32. 被引量:17

二级参考文献67

  • 1Mark S. Halfon. Integrity: A Philosophical Inquiry. Philadephia: Temple University Press, 1989.
  • 2Robert Noggle. " Integrity, the Self, and Desire-Based Accounts of the Good". Philosophical Studies ,1999,96 (12).
  • 3伯纳德·威廉斯.《道德运气》,上海,上海译文出版社,2007.
  • 4Bernard Williams. "A Critique of Utilitarianism". in J. J. C. Smart and Ber- nard Williams. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
  • 5Elizabeth Ashford. "Utilitarianism, Integrity and Partiality". The Journal of Philosophy, 2000,97(8).
  • 6C. L. Ten. "Jim's Utilitarian Mission". Philosophy, 1979,54(4).
  • 7Gerald Dworkin. "Review of Utilitarianism: For and Against". Philosophical Review, 1975,84(7).
  • 8John Harris. "Williams on Negative Responsibility and Integrity". The Philosophical Quarterly, 1974, 24(7).
  • 9John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge,MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1999.
  • 10Gregory Trianosky. "Moral Integrity and Moral Psychology". Journal of Value Inquiry, 1986(20).

共引文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部