期刊文献+

伐昔洛韦联合恩再适预防带状疱疹后神经痛的临床观察 被引量:14

Clinical Effect of Valacidovir Combined with Analgecine in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察伐昔洛韦联合牛痘疫苗致炎兔皮提取物注射液预防带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的临床疗效及安全性。方法将来解放军三〇三医院皮肤科就诊的80例带状疱疹患者简单随机化分为伐昔洛韦联合恩再适组(A组)和伐昔洛韦组(B组),每组各40例。两组患者均给予伐昔洛韦口服,每次0.3 g,每日2次;A组患者同时静脉注射恩再适7.2U/d,连续5 d。观察两组患者的疼痛减轻时间、消失时间、PHN发生比率。结果 A组疼痛减轻时间为(6.8±4.2)d,疼痛消失时间为(16.5±5.4)d,均较B组(12.2±5.8)d和(26.1±8.1)d明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组PHN发生率为7.5%,B组的发生率为30%,A组明显低于B组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论伐昔洛韦联合恩再适可缩短PHN疼痛时间,降低PHN的再发生率。 Objective To investigate the effect and safety of valacidovir combined with analgecine in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.Methods 80 cases of postherpetic neuralgia from NO.303 Hospital of People′s Liberation Army were randomly divided into valacidovir combined with analgecine group(A) and valacidovir group(B),40 cases in each group.The patients in two groups were both treated with valaciclovir 0.3 g each time,2 times a day.Analgecine were additionally used in analgecine group with the dosage of 7.2 U/d for 5 days.The pain reliefg time,pain disappearance time and the rate of postherpetic neuralgia of the two groups were observed.Results Group A pain relief time was(6.8±4.2) d and pain disappearance time was(16.5±5.4) d,obviously lower than that of group B(12.2±5.8) d and(26.1±8.1) d(P0.05).Group A(7.5%) was obvious lower than group B(30%) in the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia(P0.05).Conclusion Valacidovir combined with analgecine in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia can shorten pain relief tim and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia.
作者 陈岳
出处 《医学综述》 2013年第3期552-553,共2页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 伐昔洛韦 恩再适 带状疱疹 神经痛 Valacidovir Analgecine Herpes zoster Neuralgia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

  • 1黄冰,侯健,孙建良,陆雅萍,谢国水.双泵联合治疗老年患者带状疱疹后剧痛的疗效观察[J].中华老年医学杂志,2004,23(6):433-433. 被引量:8
  • 2虞瑞尧,李恒进,邹铭西,刘永生.神经妥乐平治疗过敏性皮肤病[J].军医进修学院学报,1995,16(4):252-255. 被引量:1
  • 3施桂英,董怡,吴钟秀,吴东海.神经妥乐平治疗腰痛症的临床观察[J].中国新药杂志,1996,5(2):107-109. 被引量:15
  • 4[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 5[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 6[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 7[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 8[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 9[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 10[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.

共引文献583

同被引文献88

引证文献14

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部