期刊文献+

总前列腺特异性抗原在化学发光免疫检测系统间的可比性研究 被引量:1

Comparability Research on Results of Total Prostate-specific Antigen Between Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨化学发光免疫分析系统测定PSA结果的可比性,为该项目推广互认提供依据。方法选择Roche与Abbott Architect作为研究对象,通过比较各台仪器的正常人参考值以及健康人群P50、P95和P97.5来考虑两者是否具有可比性。随后6个月内跟踪6台检测系统的室内质控、进行40份不同浓度新鲜患者血清的比对、结合4年内35个批次的室间质评数据,综合分析两款检测系统在整体上与个体间的可比性和差异情况,并对照澳大利亚室间质评的相关要求来讨论两款检测系统间结果是否可以推广互认。结果两款检测系统具有接近的健康人群参考范围;同款检测系统之间具有较好的一致性;不同款检测系统间则表现出整体一致性优于个体之间的一致性,且随实验室不同而表现出不同的差异率,部分差异超出了相关要求。结论基于稳定的实验室室内质控和规范的校准条件下,两款检测系统在低浓度的结果可以推广互认,不同实验室的同款检测系统也满足推广互认的要求,但不同款的检测系统之间的互认尚存在不确定性,需进一步验证。 Objective To investigate and analyze the comparability of serum prostate - specific antigen measurements between auto- mated chemiluminescence immunoassay systems. It is valuable to provide the basis for the mutual approval between laboratories on results. Methods Six systems from Roche and Abbott Architect in six laboratories were involved in this research. Normal reference ranges of each laboratory were compared to confirm that both two brands of systems are comparable. We measured PSA concentrations in each of 40 serum samples during six months and compared the results using various statistical methods. EQA data from National Center for Clinical Labora- tory were analyzed to show the comparability between analyzer groups. Evaluation standards of Australia were used to measure whether these differences influence the clinical diagnosis. Results Both brands of systems had the similar reference ranges in healthy groups. The differences between the same brands were smaller than the different. The general's differences are smaller than the individuals'. No signif- icant regular of differences between individuals was found in this research. Conclusion The results at lower concentrations can be mutual approved between the two brands of systems based on a stable internal quality control and reliable traceability chains. The same systems in different laboratories also meet the requirements of mutual approval. More researches are required to verify the differences between differ- ent brands of systems.
作者 周俊 宋超
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2013年第2期159-163,共5页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 检验结果互认 检测系统比对 前列腺特异性抗原 化学发光免疫分析 Mutual approval Prostate specific antigen System comparison Chemiluminescence immunoassay
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(formerly NCCLS). Primary reference preparations used to standardize calibration of immunochemical assays for serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) ; approved guideline[D].Wayne,PA:Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,1997.
  • 2Stockl D,DeWitte K,Thienpont LM. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies:is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data[J].Clinical Chemistry,1998,(11):2340-2346.
  • 3吴健民.加强肿瘤标志物临床应用的质量管理[J].华中医学杂志,2007,31(1):1-3. 被引量:5
  • 4刘瑾,王兰兰,蔡蓓,李佳琦,阳红.1481例男性正常人血清甲胎蛋白、癌胚抗原以及总前列腺特异性抗原95%参考值范围的确定[J].华西医学,2006,21(3):561-562. 被引量:9
  • 5叶应妩;王毓三;申子瑜.全国临床检验操作规程[M]南京:东南大学出版社,2006703-705.
  • 6Marion AG,Russell RC. Comparability of serum prostate-specific antigen measurement between the Roche Diagnostics Elecsys 2010 and the Abbott Architect i2000[J].Ann Clan Biochem,2004.207-212.
  • 7Walter H,Martina Z. Evaluation of analytical methods and workflow performance of the Architect ci8200 integrated serum/plasma analyzer system[J].Clinics Chemicals Acta,2005,(01):43-54.
  • 8王治国.临床检验方法确认与性能验证[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2009213-218.
  • 9Ishibashi M. Standardization of prostate-specific antigen(PSA) assays:can interchangeability of PSA measurements be improved.[J].Clinical Chemistry,2006,(01):1-2.

二级参考文献5

共引文献12

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部