期刊文献+

物理性人-机器人交互研究与发展现状 被引量:23

Research and development statue of physical human-robot interaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了物理性人-机器人交互的定义,对该过程可能对人造成的伤害进行了分析,给出了物理性人-机器人交互安全评价指标,并总结了目前该领域采用的安全策略。综述了国内外在物理性人-机器人交互方面的研究进展,在分析物理性人-机器人交互研究现状的基础上,阐述了该领域面临的问题和挑战。文章指出,目前物理性人-机器人交互伤害分析和安全评估研究主要集中在钝/锐碰撞造成的骨骼和软组织伤害上,缺乏对脏器、血管、神经等损伤的研究。安全策略主要方法有碰撞避免、包裹软弹性材料、关节柔顺设计等。通过对比各种安全策略的设计思想和组成方案,总结出了各种策略的优缺点和存在的主要问题。由于现有的研究表明单一的手段和策略无法保证人-机器人交互的安全性,提出将认知性人-机器人交互和物理性人-机器人交互相结合来增强后者的安全性将是未来发展的方向。 The definition of physical human-robot interaction is introduced,the injuries for human from the interaction processing are analyzed,and the safety assessments are given.Then,it summarizes the safety strategy used in the physical human-robot interaction.Furthermore,it presents the research progress in the physical human-robot interaction and highlights the questions and challenges in this field on the basis of analysis and research mentioned above.This paper points out that the injuries analysis and safety assessments of physical human-robot interaction mainly focus on the blunt/sharp collision caused the bones and soft tissue injury currently,and lack of study on organs,blood vessels,nerves,and other injuries.Collision avoidance,wrapped in soft elastic material and compliant joint design are the main safety policy.By comparing design ideas and construction schemes of these methods,it summarizes the advantages,disadvantages and main problems.It suggests that the combination of cognitive human-robot interaction and physical human-robot interaction will be the developing direction to enhance the safety of the latter because a single means or a strategy can not guarantee the safety of human-robot interaction.
出处 《光学精密工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期356-370,共15页 Optics and Precision Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.61263045 50905083 51265034) 国家博士后基金资助项目(No.2011M501090) 江西省科技支撑计划资助项目(No.20112BBE50017)
关键词 物理性人-机器人交互 伤害分析 安全评诂 安全反应策略 physical human-robot interaction injury analysis safe evaluation safe reaction strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献60

  • 1GOODRICH M A, SCHULTZ A C. Human-robot interaction: A survey [J]. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2007, 1 (3) : 203- 275.
  • 2SANTIS A D. Modelling and Control for Human- Robot Interaction [D]. Napoli: Doctor Thesis of Universit'a Degli Studi di Napoli Federico Ⅱ, 2007.
  • 3HADDADIN S, SCHAFFER A A, HIRZINGER G. Requirements for safe robots: Measurements, a- nalysis and new insights [J].The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28 ( 11-12 ) : 1507-1527.
  • 4HADDADIN S, SCHAFFER A A, HIRZINGER G. The role of the robot mass and velocity in physi- cal human-robot interaction- part I: Non-constrained blunt impacts [C]. International Conference on Ro- botics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA : 2008:1331-1338.
  • 5LUCA A D, SCHAFFER A A, HADDADIN S, et al.. Collision detection and safe reaction with DLR- Ⅲ lightweight manipulator arm [C]. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Bei- jing, China :2006 : 1623-1630.
  • 6GAO D, WAMPLER C W. Head injury criterion [J]. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 2009, 16(4) :71-74.
  • 7BICCHI A, TONIETTI G. Fast and"soft-arm"tac- tics [J]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2004, 11(2) :22-33.
  • 8HADDADIN S, SCHAFFER A A, HIRZINGER G. The role of the robot mass and velocity in physi- cal human-robot interaction- part Ⅱ.constrainedblunt impacts [C]. International Conference on Ro- botics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA : 2008:1339-134.
  • 9HADDADIN S. Evaluation Criteria and Control Structure for Safe Human-robot Interaction [D]. Munich.. Technical University of Munich&DLR, 2005.
  • 10HADDADIN S, SCHAFFER A A, HIRZINGER G. Safety evaluation of physical human-robot in- teraction via crash-testing [C]. In Robotics: Sci- ence and Systems Conference 2007 (RSS2007), Atlanta, USA : 2007 : 1-8.

同被引文献133

引证文献23

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部