摘要
对GBAS精度性能进行了分析。分别按照基于码减载波(code minus carrier,CMC)和B值两种方法对GBAS基准站实际数据进行了分析。CMC分析结果和B值的分析结果一致表明,GBAS基准站的精度性能等级约为GAD-A2。CMC分析法与B值分析方法具有一些不同的特点。CMC需要使用双频观测量;B值只需要单频观测量。CMC消除了短周期的多路径效应,主要反映的是长周期的多路径效应;B值经过GBAS基准站接收机平均,反映了不同接收机组合的多路径综合效应,更能反映GBAS差分校正误差的实际影响。除此之外,CMC分析法与B值分析法的天空图可以直观地评估GBAS站址的多路径环境。
The paper assessed GBAS accuracy performance based on two methods. A GBAS prototype was developed and used to collect and process GPS data. Based on the raw data, two methods called CMC and B values were used to analysis to GBAS accuracy performance. The result of both methods showed consistently that the GBAS prototype accuracy was on the level of GAD-A2 class. Compared with each other, CMC needs to use observations of dual frequencies, however, B values rely on single frequency. Secondly, CMC suppressed short-term muhipath errors, and long-term muhipath effects remained. B values, however, mainly consist of composite effects of multiple receivers' errors after averaging across reference receivers, which reflect realistic errors of GBAS corrections as both occupied similar processes. Lastly, sky-maps of root mean squares of CMC and B values reflected surrounding muhipath effects of GBAS sites.
出处
《中国民航大学学报》
CAS
2013年第1期9-12,26,共5页
Journal of Civil Aviation University of China
基金
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2011CB707004)
国家科技支撑计划(2011BAH24B02)
国家自然科学基金项目(61179054)