摘要
"自由"被资产阶级自诩为一项普遍原则,但是市民社会下超验意识形态的虚假性与经验自由的悖论演绎了自由在法律上的"普遍性"与历史现实的"贫困性"之间的张力。这种差异性的内在根据植根于市民社会的历史基础——资本。以资本的参与为前提的市民社会的自由由此由形式上的权利过渡到了实质上的能力,这种形式与实质的分裂恰恰构成马克思批判市民社会的历史前提与逻辑起点。
"Freedom" is prided as a general principle by the capitalist class but the falsity of the tran-scendental ideology under civil society and the paradox of freedom of the experience deduce the tension be-tween the law of "universality" and the "poverty" of historical reality about freedom. The inner reason of the kind of difference accords to the history base of civil society - Capital. On the premise of Capital participation, the freedom of civil society makes the transition from formal fight to virtual ability. The division of form and substance is the historical premise and logical starting point of Marxist criticism to civil society.
出处
《泰山学院学报》
2013年第1期7-11,共5页
Journal of Taishan University
关键词
自由
资本
平等
freedom
capital
equality