期刊文献+

基于行为决策理论的公务员决策偏差问卷的编制 被引量:2

A Study on Development of the Decision-making Biases Scale for Civil Servants:Based on Behavioral Decision-making Theories
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于文献分析建构公务员决策偏差的理论模型包括信息收集、信息编辑与信息评估三个阶段的偏差,运用心理测量理论与技术,编制公务员决策偏差问卷并验证其信度与效度。将A版本(n=231)与B版本(n=227)在公务员中施测,结果表明,公务员决策偏差问卷包括信息收集偏差因子、信息编辑偏差因子与信息评估偏差因子;A、B版本的问卷均具有较高的内部一致性信度、复本信度、内容效度与结构效度;A、B两个版本的问卷为平行测验,是测评公务员决策偏差的有效工具。 The present study proposed a theoretical frame for civil servants'decision- making biases based on revie- wing relative behavioral decision - making theories. The theoretical frame consisted of biases in three stages which were information collecting, information editing and information evaluating. To develop civil servants'decision- making biases scale, and to confirm reliabilities and validities of the scale, the psychometric theories and tech- niques were employed. The civil servants were asked to complete the scales of A - version ( n = 231 ) and B - ver- sion ( n = 227 ). The data suggested that both the A - version and B - version were of internal consistency reliabili- ty, as well as contend validity and construct validity, and that A - version and B - version ( n = 205) were of alter- nate -form reliability. Therefore, the results of the present study revealed that the civil servants'decision- making biases scale consisted of three factors which were information collecting biases factor, information editing biases fac- tor and information evaluating biases factor, and that the two versions were parallel test which were effective tools to measure civil servants'decision -making biases.
作者 曹蓉 饶丛权
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期72-77,共6页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金(10YJA630006) 国家社会科学基金项目(12BGL001) 西北大学研究生教育创新基金(08YJC01)
关键词 决策偏差 信度 效度 公务员 decision - making biases reliability validity civil servants
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1斯科特普劳斯;施俊琦;王星.判断与决策[M]北京:人民邮电出版社,2004.
  • 2王智辉.不正确的决策为何畅通无阻[J].领导科学,2009(21):47-48. 被引量:2
  • 3DE BRUIN W B,PAKER A M,FISCHHOFF B. Individual Differences in Adult Decision-Making Competence[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007,(05):938-956.
  • 4BJ(O)RKLUND F,B(A) CKSTR(O)M M. Individual Differences in Processing Styles:Validity of the Rational-Experiential Inventory[J].Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,2008,(05):439-446.
  • 5HADLEY C N,PITTINSKY T L,SOMMER S A. Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis:The C-LEAD scale[J].Leadership Quarterly,2011,(04):633-648.
  • 6KEREN G,DE BRUIN B. Thinking:Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning,Judgment and Decision Making.Edited by David Hardman and Laura Macchi[M].John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.C1,2003.
  • 7KAHNEMAN D,SLOVIC P,TVERSKY A. Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[M].New York:cambridge University Press,1982.
  • 8KAHNEMAN D,TVERSKY A. Prospect Theory:An Anal ysis of Decision under Risk[J].Econometrica,1979,(02):263-291.
  • 9TVERSKY A,KAHNEMAN D. Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[J].Science New Series,1974,(4157):1124-1131.
  • 10罗伯特斯·滕伯格;杨炳钧.认知心理学[M]北京:中国轻工业出版社,2006.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Thaler. Behavioral Economics [Z]. NBER Working Paper (7948), 2000.
  • 2Camerer, Loewenstein. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future: Introduction to Advances in Behavioral Economics[M]. Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • 3Amini, Lannon, Louie, Baumbacher, McGuiness, Schiff. Affect, Attachment and Memory: Contributions toward Psychologic Integration [J]. Psychiatry, 1996, (59).
  • 4Kahneman, Tversky. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk [J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2).
  • 5Fischhoff, Lichtenstein. Knowing with Uncertainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence[Z]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977.
  • 6Shefrin. Beyond Greed and Fear[M]. MA Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
  • 7De Bondt, Werner Thaler. Does the Stock Market Overreact? [J]. Journal of Finance, 1985, (40).
  • 8Shiller. Human Behavior and The efficiency of the Financial System [A]. J. Taylor and M. Woodford. Handbook of Macroeconomics[C]. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999.
  • 9O'Barr, Conley. Fortune and Folly: The Wealth and Power of Institutional Investing[M]. IL: Irwin, Homewood,1992.
  • 10Hirshleifer. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing[J]. Journal of Finance, 2001, (56).

共引文献10

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部