期刊文献+

《婚姻法》第32条第2款新释——基于社会与国家分离的视角

A New Perspective to Interpret the Paragraph 2 of Article 32 of Marriage Law——From the Perspective of Separation of Society and Nation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行《婚姻法》第32条第2款关于离婚之规定中,并没有明文规定判决"不准离婚"。文章试图从社会与国家的二元分离视角重新详细阐释该款规定的真实涵义和立法精神,揭示出原有理解的错误性和法律解释、司法实践的违法性。进而必然地,建基其上的判决"不准离婚"制度也是非法的和错误的。在当代中国,应正确认识婚姻的本质及其与国家之间的正确关系,尤其要明白国家之立法、行政和司法在离婚中仅具有消极功能。 There was no specific provisions about the judgment on forbidding divorcing in the current Marriage Law paragraph 2 of article 32.This paper tries to interpret the real meaning and spirit of legislation from the perspective of the separation between state and civil society.And then it also reveals the wrong of original understanding,illegality of legal interpretation and judicial practice.Inevitably,the system of judgment on forbidding divorcing which is based on them is also illegal and wrong.In contemporary China,it claims that we should rediscover and introspect the essence of marriage and the rightful relationship between marriage and state.Especially,it should be clearly realized that legislating,administrating and judicial practice only has negative function.
作者 陈炜强
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2013年第1期8-11,共4页 Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 婚姻法 第32条第2款 法律解释 判决“不准离婚” Marriage law Paragraph 2 of article 32 Legal interpretation Judgment on forbidding divorcing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1费希特;谢地坤;程志民;梁志学.自然法权基础[M]北京:商务印书馆,2006323.
  • 2Fichte,J.G,Neuhouser,Frederick. Foundations of Natural Right:According to the Principles of the Wissenschafislehr[M].Cambridge University Press,2000.275.
  • 3黑格尔;范扬;张企泰.法哲学原理[M]商务印书出版社,1982177.
  • 4马克思;恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集[M]北京:人民出版社,1956.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部