小河沿文化界说

Redefinition of the Xiaoheyan Culture

关于小河沿文化的内涵和命名问题,学术界虽讨论了多年,但至今仍存在较大争议。通过对燕山以北地区小河沿文化遗址材料和墓地材料的检讨,重新界定了小河沿文化的基本内涵和分布范围。经过进一步的比对分析,认为燕山以南的雪山一期遗存、中贾壁遗存、午方遗存(类型)总体特征与小河沿文化区别明显,不宜纳入小河沿文化范畴。燕山以南各类遗存中所见的少部分小河沿文化因素,实为相同时期诸考古学文化之间彼此交流或受到了相同文化影响的结果。

The connotation and naming of Xiaoheyan Culture have been discussed for a couple of years while even till present time they are quite controversial in archaeology circle. Being through inspecting and discussing on the materials of Xiaoheyan Culture sites and graveyards located to the north of Yan Mountain, this thesis redefines the basic connotation and location of Xiaoheyan Culture. After analysis and comparing with the re- mains of the first phase of Xueshan, Zhongjiabi remains, Wufang remains which are all located to the south of Yah Mountain, the thesis figures out the general features of these remains are distinguished from Xiaohey- an Culture obviously. According to the analysis, these remains should not belong to the Xiaoheyan Culture, while a few remains located to the south of Yan Mountain with some Xiaoheyan Culture elements are resulted from the archaeological cultural exchanges and influences in the same age of history.