期刊文献+

Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in early ankylosing spondylitis 被引量:13

Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in early ankylosing spondylitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background With the advanced MRI techniques, pathologic features can be detected at an early stage and quantitatively evaluated, resulting in the advantages of early diagnosis and prompt treatment. This study aimed to determine the value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in detection of early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate the characteristic manifestations of AS on whole body DWl (WB-DWl). Methods Twenty patients with the diagnosis of early AS, twenty patients with low back pain (LBP), and twenty-five healthy volunteers were included in this study. The subchondral bone apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) among these groups in the bilateral ilia and sacrum along the sacroiliac joints were compared. An independent sample t-test was utilized to analyze ADC value differences among groups. P-values less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance. The mean ADC values of focal DWl lesions in AS patients were also measured. Whole body diffusion-weighted imaging was performed in fifteen additional AS patients, and analyzed with MIP and MPR techniques in comparison to conventional MR images in order to evaluate the ability to detect AS lesions with whole body DWI. Results Mean ADC values in AS patients were (0.518±0.122)×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.503+0.168)x103 mm2/s in the sacrum. These were significantly greater than the values measured in the ilium and sacrum of LBP patients, (0.328±0.053)×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.311±0.081)×10^-3 m2/s in the sacrum, and control group, (0.325±0.015)×10-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.318±0.011)×10^-3 mm2/s in the sacrum respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between LBP group and control group. The mean ADC value of focal DWI lesions in early AS patients was (0. 899±0.265)×10^-3 mm2/s, which was significantly higher than that of adjacent normal-appearance areas ((0.454±0.079)×10^-3 mm2/s). WB-DWl detected abnormalities in the 15 additional AS patients both within the sacroiliac joints and at other sites mean ADC value of focal DWl lesions of this patient (1.220±0.299) ×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium. corresponding to the clinical symptoms of the patients. The cohort was (1.286±0.311)×10^-3 mm2/s in the sacrum and Conclusions Subchondral marrow ADC values of subchondral marrows near the sacroiliac joints allow for the differentiation of patients with early AS from normal volunteers and LBP patients. Combined with post-processing techniques such as MIP and MPR, WB-DWl allows for the comprehensive assessment of AS patients, an evaluation potentially helpful in determining prognosis and following the therapeutic response. Background With the advanced MRI techniques, pathologic features can be detected at an early stage and quantitatively evaluated, resulting in the advantages of early diagnosis and prompt treatment. This study aimed to determine the value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in detection of early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate the characteristic manifestations of AS on whole body DWl (WB-DWl). Methods Twenty patients with the diagnosis of early AS, twenty patients with low back pain (LBP), and twenty-five healthy volunteers were included in this study. The subchondral bone apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) among these groups in the bilateral ilia and sacrum along the sacroiliac joints were compared. An independent sample t-test was utilized to analyze ADC value differences among groups. P-values less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance. The mean ADC values of focal DWl lesions in AS patients were also measured. Whole body diffusion-weighted imaging was performed in fifteen additional AS patients, and analyzed with MIP and MPR techniques in comparison to conventional MR images in order to evaluate the ability to detect AS lesions with whole body DWI. Results Mean ADC values in AS patients were (0.518±0.122)×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.503+0.168)x103 mm2/s in the sacrum. These were significantly greater than the values measured in the ilium and sacrum of LBP patients, (0.328±0.053)×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.311±0.081)×10^-3 m2/s in the sacrum, and control group, (0.325±0.015)×10-3 mm2/s in the ilium and (0.318±0.011)×10^-3 mm2/s in the sacrum respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between LBP group and control group. The mean ADC value of focal DWI lesions in early AS patients was (0. 899±0.265)×10^-3 mm2/s, which was significantly higher than that of adjacent normal-appearance areas ((0.454±0.079)×10^-3 mm2/s). WB-DWl detected abnormalities in the 15 additional AS patients both within the sacroiliac joints and at other sites mean ADC value of focal DWl lesions of this patient (1.220±0.299) ×10^-3 mm2/s in the ilium. corresponding to the clinical symptoms of the patients. The cohort was (1.286±0.311)×10^-3 mm2/s in the sacrum and Conclusions Subchondral marrow ADC values of subchondral marrows near the sacroiliac joints allow for the differentiation of patients with early AS from normal volunteers and LBP patients. Combined with post-processing techniques such as MIP and MPR, WB-DWl allows for the comprehensive assessment of AS patients, an evaluation potentially helpful in determining prognosis and following the therapeutic response.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2013年第4期668-673,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30870701 and No. 81071133).
关键词 diffusion weighted imaging ankylosing spondylitis sacroiliac joint diffusion weighted imaging ankylosing spondylitis sacroiliac joint
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Moll JM, Haslock I, Macrae IF, Wright V. Associations between ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Reiter's disease, the intestinal arthropathies, and Behcet's syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore) 1974; 53: 343-364.
  • 2Braun J, Sieper J. The sacroiliac joint in the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol1996; 8: 275-287.
  • 3Boonen A, van der Linden SM. The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2006; 78 (Suppl): 4-11.
  • 4Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1109-1114.
  • 5Oostveen J, Prevo R, den Boer J, van de Laar M. Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 1953-1958.
  • 6Goh L, Suresh P, Gafoor A, Hughes P, Hickling E Disease activity in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis: a correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Clin Rheumato 2008; 27: 449-455.
  • 7Gaspersic N, Sersa 1, Jevtic V, Tomsic M, Praprotnik S. Monitoring ankylosing spondylitis therapy by dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37:123-131.
  • 8Zochling J, Baraliakos X, Hermann KG, Braun J. Magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007; 19: 346-352.
  • 9Ramos-Remus C, Hemandez-Rios G, Duran-Barragan S, Sanchez-Ortiz A, Aceves-Avila F J, Castillo-Ortiz JD, et al. Fifteen-year trends of long-term disability and sick leaves in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumato12011; 30: 361-367.
  • 10Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 2007; 369:1379-1390.

同被引文献64

  • 1盛华强,赵斌.强直性脊柱炎的早期骶髂关节炎:MRI与临床及实验室相关性[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(6):774-777. 被引量:12
  • 2Dejaco C, Duftner C, Schirmer M. Imaging techniques for early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis [ J ]. Wien Med Wochenschr, 2008,158 ( 7-8 ) : 191-194.
  • 3Braun J, Baraliakos X, Hermann K G, et al. Golimumab reduces spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: MRI results of the randomized, placeboeontrolled GO- RAISE study[ J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2012,71 (6) :874- 884.
  • 4Ryan L M, Carrera G F, Lightfoot R W Jr, et al. The ra- diographic diagnosis of sacroiliitis. A comparison of dif- ferent views with computed tomograms of the sacroiliac join [ J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1983,26(6) :760-763.
  • 5Amrami K K. Imaging of the seronegative [ J ]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2012,50(4) :841-854.
  • 6Lee Y H, Hong Y S, Park W, et al. Value of multide- tector computed tomography for the radiologie grading of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis [ J ]. Rheumatol Int, 2013,33(4) :1005-1011.
  • 7Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, et al. The Assess- ment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloArthritis [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2009,68 ( suppl2 ) : ii1 -ii44.
  • 8Bollow M, Fischer T, Backhans M, et al. Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies : T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis-cellularity correlates with the degree of en- hancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging[ J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2000,59(2) :135-140.
  • 9Algin O, Gokalp G, Baran B, et al. Evaluation of sacroi- liitis: contrast enhanced MRI with subtraction technique [ J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2009,38 (10) :983-988.
  • 10Braun J, Baraliakos X, Golder W, et al. Assessment of acute spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison between contrast enhanced T1 and short tau inversion re- covery (STIR) sequences[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2005,64 (8) :1141-1144.

引证文献13

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部