期刊文献+

三种根管封闭剂根管封闭性能的实验研究 被引量:7

An expermental study of the sealability of three root canal sealers in vitro
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较三种根管封闭剂的根管封闭能力。方法:选择103颗单根离体牙,根管预备后随机分为3组,分别用AH-plus根管封闭剂+牙胶(A组)、Cortisomol根管封闭剂+牙胶(B组)、EndoREZ双固化UDMA树脂根管封闭剂+牙胶(C组)侧方加压法充填根管,扫描电镜观察封闭剂与根管结合情况,并进行染色法微渗漏实验,观察3、7、30 d染色线长度。结果:扫描电镜下观察,树脂类封闭剂与根管壁结合紧密,染色法发现Cortisomol组染色3、7、30 d较其它两组微渗漏值高,3、7 d无显著性差异(P>0.05),30 d时有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:树脂类根管封闭剂根管封闭性能较好。 Objective: To evaluate the sealability of three root sealers in vitro. Method: 103 extracted single rooted human teeth were prepared and were randomly divided into three groups.The root canals were filled with AH-plus+guttapercha (A group), Cortisomol+gutta-percha (B group) and EndoREZ dual cure UDMA resin root canal sealer+gutta-percha (C group ) respectively.The microstructure of the three groups were observed by SEM.The apical sealing capability was es- timated by dye penetration method at 3,7, 30 d after condensation. Result: Microleakge of Cortisomol group was highest and the difference between Cortisomol group and the other two groups at 30d was statistically significant (P 〈0.05) .Conclusion: The sealability of resin sealer was better than others.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2013年第2期103-105,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 微渗漏 根管充填 扫描电镜 根管封闭剂 microleakge root canal obturation scanning electron microscope: root canal sealer
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Inan U,Aydemir H,Tasdemir T. Leakage evaluation of three different root canal obturation techniques using electrochemical evaluation and dye penetration evaluation methods[J].Australian Endodontic Journal,2007,(01):18-22.
  • 2刘晓斌,侯本祥,卫书盛,宿颖.GuttaFlow根管充填系统根尖封闭的微渗漏研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2008,22(4):356-358. 被引量:21
  • 3Bouillaguet S,Shaw L,Barthelemy J. Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer,AH-Plus,GuttaFlow and Ep iphany[J].International Endodontic Journal,2008,(03):219-226.
  • 4Lea CS,Ap icella MJ,Mines P. Comparison of the obturation density of cold lateral compaction versus warm vertical compaction using the continuous wave of condensation technique[J].Journal of Endodontics,2005,(01):372-391.doi:10.1097/01.DON.0000129037.75547.80.
  • 5范晓敏,银颂,穆云静,赵明,李淮.三种根管糊剂在离体牙热牙胶充填中根尖封闭效果的比较研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2011,21(2):82-85. 被引量:15
  • 6徐爱凤,张琛,侯本祥.不同根管封闭剂根管充填术后疼痛的临床研究[J].北京口腔医学,2005,13(2):108-110. 被引量:32
  • 7Jose F,Siquerira,Amauri Favieri. Antimicrobial activity and flow rate of newer and established root canal sealers[J].Journal of Endodontics,2000,(05):274-277.
  • 8Orstavik D,Nordahl I,Tibballs JE. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials[J].J Dent Mater,2001,(06):512-519.
  • 9Timpawat S,Amornchat C,Trisuwan WR. Bacterial coronal leakage after obturation with three root cancal sealers[J].Journal of Endodontics,2001,(01):36-39.
  • 10Hammad M,Qualtrough A,Silikas N. Effect of new obturating mate-rials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth[J].Journal of Endodontics,2007,(06):732-736.

二级参考文献32

  • 1肖丹,高燕,黄小兰.Cortisomol根管糊剂根尖封闭能力的实验研究[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(3):319-320. 被引量:29
  • 2张举之.口腔内科学(第三版)[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.778.
  • 3Basmadjian-Charles CL, Farge P, Bourgeois DM, et al. Factors influencing the long-term results of endodontic treatment : a review of the literature [J]. Int Dent J, 2002,52(2) :81 -86.
  • 4Lim T, Wee T,Choi M, et al. Light and scaning electron microsopic evaluation of glyde file prep in smear layer removal [J].Int Endod J, 2003,36(5) :336 -343.
  • 5Boucher Y, Matossian L, Rilliard F, et ul. Radiographic evaluation of the revalence and technical quality of root canal treatment in a French subpopulation [ J ]. Int Endod J,2002,35 (3) : 229- 238.
  • 6Villegas JC,Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, et al. Three-step versus single-step use of system B : evaluation of gutta-percha root canal fillings and their adaptation to the canal walls [ J ]. J Endol,2004,30(10) :719 - 721.
  • 7Wimonchit S.Timpawat S,Vongsavan N. A comparison of techniques for assessment of coronal dye leakage [ J ]. J Endod, 2002,28(1):1- 4.
  • 8Wu MK, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Decoloration of 1% methylene blue solution in cnntact with dental filling materials [J]. JDent, 1998, 26(7):585 -589.
  • 9Han GY, Park SH, Yon TC, et al. Antimicrobial activity of Ca(OH)2 containing pastes with EnterococctLs faecalis in vitro [J]. J Endod, 2001,27(5) :328 -332.
  • 10De Moor RJ, De Witte AM. Periapical lesions accidentally filled with calcium hydroxide[J], lnt Endod J,2002,35 ( 11 ) :946 - 958.

共引文献65

同被引文献64

  • 1俞长路.纤维桩研究进展[J].国外医学(生物医学工程分册),2005,28(3):172-174. 被引量:71
  • 2谷海晶,刘丽敏,徐琼,欧阳勇,凌均棨.3种根充糊剂微渗漏的实验研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2007,25(3):257-259. 被引量:22
  • 3Mai S,Kim YK,Hiraishi N,et al. Evaluation of the trueself-etching potential of a fourth generation self-adhesivemethacrylate resin-based sealer[J]. J Endod,2009,35(6):870-874.
  • 4Peumans M,Hikita K,De Munck J,et al. Bond durabilityof composite luting agents to ceramic when exposed tolong-term thermocycling[J]. Oper Dent, 2007,32 (4) :372-379.
  • 5Vano M,Cury AH,Goracci C,et al. Retention of fiberposts cemented at different time intervals in canals obtu-rated using an epoxy resin sealer [J]. J Dent, 2008 ,36(10):801-807.
  • 6Zielinski TM, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG,et al. An e-valuation of Guttaflow and gutta-percha in the filling oflateral grooves and depressions [J]. J Endod , 2008 , 34(3):295-298.
  • 7Eldeniz AU, Orstavik D. A laboratory assessment ofcoronal bacterial leakage in root canals filled with newand conventional sealers [J]. Int Endod J, 2009,42 (4):303-312.
  • 8刁一凯.三种不同类型根充糊剂根尖封闭性能的比较研究[J].中国保健营养,2013,6(4):153-154.
  • 9张凌,陈吉华,Elisa Magni,Ivana Radovic,Marco Ferrari.四种粘结材料对纤维桩在不同深度根管内的固位力的影响——薄片推出实验[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(6):643-646. 被引量:7
  • 10李莉,刘荣森,郭贵华,韩淑凤,闫昕.3种根管充填材料冠方微渗漏的体外评价[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2008,6(2):109-111. 被引量:8

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部