摘要
王士禛评点《钱注杜诗》的杜诗评语与邵长蘅的杜诗评语基本相同,将二人杜诗评语全部辑录进行比较,根据《钱注杜诗》卷十一末朱笔书曰"乙未二月望月系毕"一语以及邵长蘅与宋荦的密切关系,对王士禛杜诗评语进行厘定考证,得出了《钱注杜诗》中王士禛的杜诗评语是佚名所录而成,且归属权实属邵长蘅的结论。杜诗评点出现文献混淆的原因,首先在于杜诗评点发展到清代,评点家甚多,集评本辑录数名家之评语,难免混淆;各种杜诗评点版本的评语本身常被借来借去,便出现了假冒现象。其次是邵长蘅杜诗评点具有独到之处,评点本又未刊刻示于公众,故会邵冠王戴。此外,评点者以王士禛之名势来提升《钱注杜诗》版本的传播价值。
Wang Shizhen's commentaries on Qian Qianyi 'Annotation of Du Fu's Poetry are basically the same as Shao Changheng's. Through the comparison between their whole commentaries,the paper con- cludes that some of the former's commentaries are actually the latter's. Then,the paper gives the reasons for the confusion of li sions, specific characte er. terature from the perspectives of different commentators, various commentary ver- ristics of Shao Changheng 's commentaries, and Wang Shizhen's reputation and pow-
出处
《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第1期16-23,共8页
Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
关键词
《钱注杜诗》
王士禛评语
邵长蘅评语
著作权
文献混淆之因
Qian Qian yi 'Annotation of Du Fu' s Poetry
Wang Shizhen's commentaries^Shao Chang-heng ' s commentaries
copyright
reasons for literature confusion