摘要
网络服务提供者在网络环境下的知识产权侵权中承担间接侵权责任时,主观过错的认定具有重要意义。主观过错包括"明知"和"应知",权利人的"通知"或者"警告"只是判断网络服务提供者"知道"的一个途径,而不是唯一途径。根据"通知与移除"规则判断网络服务提供者是否适用"避风港"原则的同时,也需要明确是否符合"红旗标准",只有将"避风港原则"和"红旗标准"综合运用,才能正确认定网络服务提供者的主观过错。
The paper thinks that the affirmation of the subjective faults of network service providers is of great importance when they assume indirect tort liability in the network environment. Subjective faults include "knowing perfectly well" and "being knowable", the obligees' notice or warn is merely a way of judging that network service providers know,but not the only way. At the same time when judging whether network service providers apply to safe harbor or not, whether they are according with red flag standard must be cleared. Only combining safe harbor with red flag standard are the subjective faults of network service providers identified correctly.
出处
《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》
2013年第1期76-79,共4页
Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
关键词
网络服务提供者
主观过错
通知与移除规则
避风港
红旗标准
network service providers
subjective faults
notice and takedown rules
safe harbor red flagstandard