期刊文献+

氨糖美辛肠溶片在健康受试者体内的生物等效性研究 被引量:1

Study on Bioequivalence of Glucosamine Indometacin Enteric-coated Tablets in Healthy Volunteers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究2种氨糖美辛肠溶片的人体生物等效性。方法:采用随机双交叉试验设计,20名男性健康受试者分别单剂量口服氨糖美辛肠溶片受试制剂与参比制剂1片后,用高效液相色谱法测定氨糖美辛的血药浓度,并用3p97程序对试验数据进行统计处理。结果:受试制剂与参比制剂的主要药动学参数分别为:tmax(3.36±0.87)、(3.11±0.79)h,cmax(5.91±1.60)、(6.01±1.10)mg/L,t1/2(7.46±1.97)、(7.51±2.64)h,AUC0-24h(17.36±4.04)、(16.09±3.08)mg·h/L,AUC0-∞(19.34±4.26)、(17.58±3.58)mg·h/L。受试制剂的相对生物利用度为(109.5±13.6)%。经统计学检验,2种制剂的AUC0-∞、cmax、t1/2、tmax差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:2种氨糖美辛肠溶片具有生物等效性。 OBJECTIVE: To study the bioequivalence of 2 kinds of Glucosamine indometacin enteric-coated tablets in healthy volunteers. METHODS : In randomized crossover design, 20 male healthy volunteers received single dose of test preparation or reference preparation (1 piece) of Glucosamine indometacin enteric-coated tablets orally. The blood concentration of glucosamine indometacin was determined by HPLC. The data were analyzed by 3p97 program. RESULTS : Main pharmacokinetic parameters of test preparation and reference preparation were as follows: t_max were (3.36±0.87)h and (3.11 ± 0.79)h; C_max were (5.91 ± 1.60)mg/L and (6.01 ± 1.10)mg/L; t1/2 were (7.46 ± 1.97) h and (7.51 ± 2.64)h;AUC_0-24h were (17.36 ± 4.04)mg·h/L and(16.09 ± 3.08)mg·h/ L; AUC_0-∞ were ( 19.34 ± 4.26) mg· h/L and ( 17.58 ± 3.58) mg·h/L. The relative bioavailability of test preparation was ( 109.5±13.6)%. There was no statistical significance in AUC_0-∞ C_max and t_max between them (P〉0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 2 kinds of Glucosamine indometacin enteric-coated tablets are bioequivalent.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2013年第10期905-907,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 氨糖美辛 生物等效性 高效液相色谱法 药动学 Glucosamine indometacin Bioequivalence HPLC Pharmacokinetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1张玉琥,张彤梅,黄铖,李汉蕴.吲哚美辛控释胶囊的制备及人体生物利用度[J].中国药学杂志,1994,29(9):533-536. 被引量:16
  • 2张彤梅,张玉琥,李汉蕴.吲哚美辛控释胶囊稳态血药浓度测定及稳定性考察[J].中国药学杂志,1994,29(11):673-676. 被引量:3
  • 3贺凌云,夏宏鹏,吴建平,程泽能.高效液相色谱法测定盐酸甲氯芬酯胶囊的含量[J].分析试验室,2007,26(9):74-76. 被引量:12
  • 4Setnikar I, Rovati LC.Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of glucosamine sulfate. A review[J]. Arzneimittelforschung, 2001,51(9):699-725.
  • 5Vlad SC, LaValley MP, McAlindon TE, et al. Glucosamine for Pain in Osteoarthritis; Why Do Trial Results Differ?[J]. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2007,56 (7): 2267-77.
  • 6Towheed TE, Maxwell L, Anastassiades TP, et al. Glucosamine therapy for treating osteoarthritis[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, (2):CD002946.
  • 7Dahmer S, Schiller RM. Glucosamine. Am Fam Physician, 2008, 78(4):471-6.
  • 8Adams ME. Hype about glucosamine[J]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9176):353-4.
  • 9McAlindon TE, LaValley MP, Gulin JP, et al. Glucosamine and chondroitin for treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic qualityassessment and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2000, 283(11):1469-75.
  • 10Reginster J, Deroisy R, Rovati LC, et al. Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis progression: a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2001,357(9252):251-6.

共引文献104

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部