期刊文献+

对外贸易技术效应与中国工业CO_2排放绩效 被引量:3

Technical Effects of International Trade and Industrial CO_2 Emission Performance in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着对外贸易规模的扩大,对外贸易技术效应对中国工业CO2排放的影响如何?主要通过何种技术溢出途径影响工业CO2排放,是否存在行业异质性?本文基于DEA非参数方法测算了中国34个工业行业2001-2010年的Malmquist-Luenberger CO2排放绩效及其分解指数,并运用投入产出表构建进口和出口贸易水平技术溢出、出口贸易后向技术溢出以及进口贸易前向技术溢出四种指标,进而考察对外贸易技术效应对CO2排放绩效及其分解指数的影响。全行业的研究表明,出口贸易水平技术溢出抑制了技术进步,而出口贸易水平技术溢出和后向技术溢出促进了技术效率的改进;进口贸易水平技术溢出抑制了技术效率的改善,而进口贸易前向技术溢出促进了技术效率的提升。分行业看,出口贸易技术效应对两类行业CO2排放绩效分解指数的影响基本一致,而进口贸易技术效应的影响迥异。本文最后建议,我国应不断优化出口贸易技术结构,鼓励与促进出口贸易企业的本土化采购,扩大进口贸易中高新技术产品份额,以充分发挥对外贸易技术效应对CO2排放绩效的积极作用。 With the expansion of international trade scale, what are the technical effects of international trade on CO2 emissions? As to the technical spillovers of international trade, which are the main channels that benefit the industrial carbon abatement? Is there a difference between the technical effects of international trade in different industries? Based on the DEA non-parameter method, this paper uses the Malmquist-Luenberger index to estimate CO2 emission performance and its decomposition indexes between 2001 and 2010 across 34 Chinese industrial sectors, and it constructs the indexes of horizontal technology spillovers from import trade and export trade, backward technology spillovers from export trade and forward technology spillovers from import trade based on the input-output tables, and then examines the technical effects of international trade on CO2 emission performance and its decomposition indexes. Results from the whole 34 industries show that, horizontal technology spillovers from export trade have obvious negative effects on the technology advancement, but horizontal technology spillovers and backward technology spillovers from export trade have significant promotion effects on the technology efficiency. Horizontal technology spillovers from import trade have obvious negative effects on the technology efficiency, while forward technology spillovers from import trade improve the technology efficiency. This paper also shows that for industrial sectors, the technical effects of export trade on the technology advancement and the technology efficiency are similar comparing the heavy industries and the light industries, however, the technical effects of export trade are different. In conclusions, it brings forward solutions as follows: Chinese government should continuously optimize the technology structure of export trade, encourage and improve localization purchase of export companies, and enlarge the proportion of the high-teeh products in the import trade, in order to take full advantage of technical effects of international trade on industrial CO2 emission performance.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期92-97,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家社科基金项目"我国温室气体减排的技术路径优化与政策研究"(编号:12BJL054)
关键词 对外贸易 CO2排放绩效 技术效率 技术进步 international trade CO2 emission performance technology efficiency technology advancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Grossman,Krueger. Environmental Impact of North American Free Trade Agreement[D].NBER,1991.
  • 2Grubb M J,Hope C,Fouquet R. Climate Implications of the Kyoto Protocol:The Contribution of International Spillover[J].Climatic Change,2002,(01):11-28.
  • 3Albornoz F,Cole M A,Elliott R J. In Search of Environmental Spillovers[J].World Economy,2009,(01):136-163.
  • 4Copeland B R. International Trade and Green Growth[R].The World Bank,Mimeo,2011.1-47.
  • 5Perkins R,Neumayer E. Do Recipient Country Characteristics Affect International Spillovers of CO2-Efficiency via Trade and Foreign Direct Investment[J].Climatic Change,2012,(02):469-491.
  • 6Geng W,Zhang Y Q. The Relationship between Skill Content of Trade and Carbon Dioxide Emissions[J].International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics,2011,(11):82-91.
  • 7王群伟,周鹏,周德群.我国二氧化碳排放绩效的动态变化、区域差异及影响因素[J].中国工业经济,2010(1):45-54. 被引量:268
  • 8魏梅,曹明福,江金荣.生产中碳排放效率长期决定及其收敛性分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010,27(9):43-52. 被引量:83
  • 9Chung Y H,Fare R,Grosskopf S. Productivity and Undesirable Outputs:A Directional Distance Function Approach[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1997,(03):229-240.
  • 10Hubler M,Keller A. Energy Saving Via FDI? Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries[J].Environment and Development Economics,2009,(15):59-80.

二级参考文献32

  • 1郑照宁,刘德顺.考虑资本-能源-劳动投入的中国超越对数生产函数[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(5):51-54. 被引量:83
  • 2张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5465
  • 3郭庆旺,赵志耘,贾俊雪.中国省份经济的全要素生产率分析[J].世界经济,2005,28(5):46-53. 被引量:263
  • 4Charnes A, Cooper W. W, Rhodes E. , 1978, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement o f input, output and productivity [J]. Econometrica, 50, 1390-1414.
  • 5Fare R. , Grosskopf S, Norris M. and Zhang Z. , 1994, Productivity growth , technical progress , and efficiency change in industrialized countries [J]. American Economic Review, 84 (1), 66-83.
  • 6Hendry, D. F., 1995, Dynamic Econometrics [M]. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 255- 278.
  • 7Chung , Y. H. , R. Fare and S. Grosskopf, 1997, Productivity and Undesirable Outputs : A Directional Distance Function Approach [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240.
  • 8Fare R. and Grosskopf S. 1997, Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA [J], Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
  • 9Tyteca, D. , 1997, Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms -concepts and empirical results [J], Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, 183-197.
  • 10Kao, C. , 1999, Spurious regression and Residual -based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data [J], Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1-44.

共引文献313

同被引文献43

  • 1江洪,赵宝福.辽宁碳排放驱动因素迪氏因式分解[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(12):1724-1728. 被引量:3
  • 2包群,彭水军.经济增长与环境污染:基于面板数据的联立方程估计[J].世界经济,2006,29(11):48-58. 被引量:310
  • 3GROSSMAN G M, KRUEGER A B. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement [R]. NBER Working Paper No. 3914, 1991.
  • 4SMARZYNSKA B K, WEI S J. Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: Dirty secret or popular myth? [R]. NBER Working Paper No.8465, 2001.
  • 5GEORGIEV E, MIHAYLOV E. Economic growth and the environment: Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions in OECD countries [J]. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 2015, 8: 29-47.
  • 6ANTWEILER W, COPELAND B R, TAYLOR M S. Is free trade good for the environment? [J]. American Economic Re- view, 2001, 91(4): 877-908.
  • 7HE J. Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emis- sion of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60( 1): 228-245.
  • 8DINDA S. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2004, 49(4): 431-455.
  • 9JALIL A, MAHMUD S F. Environment Kuznets Curve for CO: emissions: A cointegration analysis for China [J]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(12): 5167-5172.
  • 10REN S, YUAN B, MA X, et al. International trade, FDI and embodied CO: emissions: A case study of Chinas industrial sectors [J]. China Economic Review, 2014, 28: 123-134.

引证文献3

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部