期刊文献+

中美青少年科技竞赛奖励政策比较研究

A Comparative Study on Prize Policy of the Youth Science Technology Competitions between China and America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 青少年科技竞赛活动是中美两国科技创新后备人才选拔和培养的重要途径。英特尔国际科学与工程大奖赛和科学人才选拔赛是美国两大著名青少年科技竞赛项目,借鉴这两项竞赛项目设立的青少年科技创新大赛和"明天小小科学家"奖励活动是目前中国最具影响力的两项青少年科技竞赛项目。本文从奖项类型、获奖等级配置、奖励形式、奖励对象四个方面对中美青少年科技竞赛项目的奖励政策进行了比较研究,并提出了规范奖励政策、丰富奖励形式、优化奖项设置结构等完善我国青少年科技竞赛奖励政策的政策建议。 The youth science technology competition is the important approach to choosing and fostering reserve talents for the innovation of science technology in China and America. ISEF and STS are two important competitions in America, while CASTIC and APFS are two competitions of great importance in China. This paper describes an overview of four competitions and makes a comparative study between China and America on the prize policy of the youth science technology competitions according to prize type, prize grade scheme, prize form and prize object. Several policy suggestions are put forward to improve the prize policy of the youth science technology competitions in China, such as normalizing prize policy, enriching prize form and optimizing prize grade scheme.
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期12-17,共6页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
基金 国家自然科学基金专项项目(J0924018)"青少年科技竞赛活动项目评估及跟踪管理"成果之一
关键词 青少年科技竞赛 奖励政策 教育公平 youth science technology competitions prize policy education equity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1韩建军,程玉,郭耀煌.基于非对称成本的设计竞赛博弈模型及奖金设置[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):84-90. 被引量:7
  • 2邓伟,杨磊,陈元旭.关于选拔性考试若干基本问题的经济分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(4):60-66. 被引量:3
  • 3MOLDOVANU B, SELA A, SHI X. Contests for Status [J].Journal of Political Economy, 2007, 115 (2) :338-363.
  • 4TULLOCK G. Efficient Rent Seeking[C]//Buchanan J M, Tollison R D, Tullock D. Toward a Theory of the Rent-seeking Society. A&M University Press, 1980:269-282.
  • 5MOLDOVANU B,SELA A. The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests [J]. The American Economic Review, 2001,91 (3) : 542- 558.
  • 6BLAVATSKYY P. Contest Success Function with the Possibility of a Draw: Axiomatization [R]. Zurith: Institute for Empirical Research, University of Zurich, 2004.
  • 7LAZEAR E,ROSEN S. Rank Order Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981,89(5): 841 - 864.
  • 8BAIK K H. Difference-form Contest Success Functions and Effort Levels in Contests [J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 1998,14 (4):685 - 701.
  • 9SKAPERDAS S. Contest Success Functions[J].Economic Theory, 1996,7 (2) : 283 - 290.
  • 10DASGUPTA A, NTI K O. Designing an Optimal Contest [J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 1998,14(4) : 587-603.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部