期刊文献+

基于结构方程模型的大学生亚健康量表效度测评 被引量:19

Test of the Construct Validity of Chinese University Students'Sub-health Scale,Based on Structural Equation Modeling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考量《中国大学生亚健康状态测量量表》的结构效度。方法采用结构方程模型的验证性因素分析,对1500名大学生施测以检验分量表和总量表的结构效度,同时采用可靠性分析再次验证量表的内部一致性、稳定性信度。结果总量表和各分量表的一致性系数(α值)在0.803~0.845,12个维度的α值在0.821~0.851,稳定性系数均在0.70以上;3个分量表具有接受度较高的结构效度:卡方值与自由度的比值都小于3.0,TLI、CFI值均超过0.90,RMSEA值介于0.075~0.042,SRMR值都接近0.05;总量表具有接受度更佳的结构效度:χ2/df为2.543;TLI、CFI值均超过0.95;RMSEA值为0.05,SRMR值为0.04。结论量表可靠性强、结构效度佳,可作为我国大学生亚健康状态研究的测量工具。 Objective To assess the construct validity of Chinese University Students' Sub-health Scale. Methods A spot trial sam- pling of 1500 individuals was conducted to study the SEM's confirmatory factor analysis, test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Resuits A test-retest reliability was above 0.7 with a Cmnbach's coefficient between 0. 821to 0. 851. Proof by the X^2 goodness-of-fit-test such as X^2/df less more 3, TLI and CFI above of 0. 90, RMSEA and SRMR near by 0. 05, the Sub-health Scale has a good construct validity. Conclusion The Chinese University Students' Sub-health Scale was tested to be reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measuring college students' sub-health.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期23-26,30,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金 国家科技部"十一.五"科技支撑计划--亚健康范畴评估标准与方法研究(2006BAI13B01)
关键词 结构方程模型 验证性因素分析 结构效度 Structural equation modeling Confirmatory factor analysis Construct validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1徐丽.中医"治未病"及亚健康中医干预研究——中国人亚健康状态测量量表的研制[D]上海:上海中医药大学,2011.7-15:111-112.
  • 2Kintner EK,Sikorskii A. Reliability and construct validity of the Participation in Life Activities Scale for children and adolescents with asthma:an instrument evaluation study[J].Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2008,(06):43-52.
  • 3Al-shair K,Kolsum U,Berry P. Development,dimensions,reliability and validity of the novel Manchester COPD fatigue scale[J].Thorax,2009,(11):950-955.
  • 4Lima HK,Woob JM,Kima TS. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised[J].Comprehensive Psychiatry,2009,(04):385-390.
  • 5闫宇翔,董晶,李蔓,杨姗姗,王嵬.亚健康状态评价问卷(SHSQ-25)判定标准的制定[J].中国卫生统计,2011,28(3):256-258. 被引量:33
  • 6Mitchell ML,Jolle YJM. Research design explalned[M].Belmont,C A:Wadsworth Thomson Learning,2004.156-201.
  • 7吴明隆.结构方程模式AMOS的操作与应用[M]台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2009328-331380.
  • 8Hoyle RH,Panter AT. Writing about structural equation models[A].Lon don:Sage Publications,1995.158-176.
  • 9Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification:An interval estimation app roach[J].Multivariate Behavioral Res,1990,(25):173-188.
  • 10Hu L,Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling:Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification[J].Psychological Methods,1998,(03):424-453.

二级参考文献35

  • 1李秀敏,魏彦茹.亚健康影响因素的统计分析[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(2):192-193. 被引量:9
  • 2[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 3[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 4[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 5[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 6[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 7[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 8[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 9[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 10[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453

共引文献1269

同被引文献196

引证文献19

二级引证文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部