期刊文献+

腹腔镜下根治性肾切除手术技巧和105例经验 被引量:16

Operating skills of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: experiences of 105 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹腔入路腹腔镜下根治性肾切除(LRN)的手术操作技巧。方法对2008年12月至2010年12月收治的105例肾肿瘤患者采用经腹腔入路行LRN。肿瘤位于左肾51例,右肾54例,直径(5.8±2.4)cm。术前肿瘤分期为T1N0M048例,T1N0M051例T1N0M06例。术中均以生殖静脉为标志寻找肾动、静脉并依次结扎,完整切除标本后经耻骨上Pfannensteil切口取出。结果105例均成功施行经腹腔“生殖静脉标志法”LRN,28例肾上极肿瘤切除同侧肾上腺,16例加行区域淋巴结清扫。无中转开放手术者,无肝、脾、肠管等重要脏器损伤。手术时间44—78min,平均(55±11)min。术中出血量35~600ml,平均(85±26)ml。术后住院时间4~11d,平均(6±2)d。主要并发症有血管损伤3例,膈肌损伤1例,淋巴漏2例。术后临床病理分期为T,N。M。44例,T1N1M01例,T2NOM047例,T:N。M01例,T3。NoMo7例,T3N1M01例,T4NOM02例,良性病变2例。术后随访9~33个月,平均18个月,出现切口疝1例,局部复发1例,死于肺转移1例。结论经腹途径“生殖静脉标志法”LRN可准确定位、迅速结扎肾蒂大血管,术中无严重副损伤,术后恢复快、并发症少。Pfannensteil切口创伤小,符合美学要求。 Objective To discuss the operating skills of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical ne- phrectomy (LRN). Methods From Dec 2008 to Dec 2010, 105 patients with renal tumors were treated by transperitoneal LRN. Fifty-one tumors were located in left kidney, and 54 in the right kidney. The mean diameter of renal tumor was (5.8 ~ 2.4) cm. There were 48 cases of T^NoM0, 51 of T2NoMo, 6 of T3aNoM0. During the process of transperitoneal LRN, vena genitalis was constantly used as an operative mark for seeking and ligating the renal artery and vein. The specimens were cut completely and removed through Pfannensteil incision. Results All the 105 cases were performed by transperitoneal LRN with ve- na genitalis marking method successfully. Twenty-eight cases of homolateral adrenal gland were resected and 16 cases of regional lymph node were cleaned. There was no serious injury of liver, spleen or bowels. The operating time ranged 44 - 78 min with an average of 55 min, and the blood loss was 35 - 600 ml with the mean of 85 ml. The post-operative length of stay was 4 - 11 d with an average of 6 d. Major complications included 3 cases of vessel injury, 1 case with an injury of diaphragmatic muscle and 2 cases with a lymphous leakage. Post-operative staging included 44 cases of Tl NoMo , 1 of T1N1Mo , 47 of T2NoM0 , 1 of T2N1M0 , 7 of T3NoMo , 1 of T3aN~ M0, 2 of T4NoMo, and 2 cases with benign lesion. The patients were followed up for 9 -33 months with an average of 18 months. One case had an incisional hernia, 1 had a local tumor recur- rence and 1 died of pulmonary metastasis. Conclusions Transperitoneal LRN with vena genitalis marking method could be safe for the treatment of renal tumors. The vena genitalis may act as a mark for the accurate location and quick ligation tbr the renal pedicle without serious injuries, and such patients could recover fast- ly with fewer complications. Pfannensteil incision has a good quality of little trauma and could meet with the need of aesthetics.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期89-92,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 腹腔镜 肾切除术 手术技巧 生殖静脉 并发症 Laparoseopes Nephrectomy Operating skill Vena genitalis Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hein VP,Frank B,Jeffrey AC. Treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma[J].European Urology,2011.662-672.
  • 2Desai MM,Strzempkowski B,Matin SF. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J].The Journal of Urology,2005.38-41.
  • 3Ha US,Hwang TK,Kim YJ. Comparison of oncological outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for the management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma:a multi-institutional study[J].British Journal of Urology International,2011.1467-1472.
  • 4Abreu SC,Messias FI,Argollo RS. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy with Y-shaped orthotopic ileal neobladder constructed with non-absorbable titanium staples through a 5 cm Pfannensteil incision[J].International Brazilian Journal of Urology,2005.362-367.
  • 5Tunuguntla HS,Nieder AM,Manoharan M. Neobladder reconstruction following radical cystoprostatectomy for invasive bladder cancer[J].Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica,2009.41-54.
  • 6Crepel M,Jeldres C,Sun M. A population-based comparison of cancer-control rates between radical and partial nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma[J].Urology,2010.883-888.
  • 7张雪培,王耀锋,魏金星,王智勇,王声政,蔡腾,王刘中.腹腔镜与开放行肾部分切除术的临床疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2011,26(4):298-300. 被引量:16
  • 8张旭,李宏召,马鑫,郑涛,徐晓峰,郭小林,陈忠,王少刚,叶章群.后腹腔镜保留肾脏手术治疗肾肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):160-162. 被引量:71
  • 9项明峰,刘飞,赵为广,潘正跃,史子敏,习小庆,黄红卫,胡映波.后腹腔镜下与开放性肾癌根治术治疗局限性肾癌的比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2011,26(5):333-335. 被引量:35
  • 10郑军华鄢阳彭波巢月根许云飞张海民高其若黄建华.腹腔镜下T2大体积肾癌根治术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(3):157-160. 被引量:12

二级参考文献60

  • 1张楠,翟振波,金雷,秦卫军,杨波,张运涛,杨力军,王禾,袁建林.Hem-o-lok在后腹腔镜解剖性根治性肾切除术中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(12):1233-1234. 被引量:12
  • 2马潞林,黄毅,田晓军,侯小飞,赵磊,卢剑,洪锴.后腹腔镜根治性肾癌切除术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):157-159. 被引量:76
  • 3张旭,李宏召.腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术治疗肾肿瘤现状[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):437-438. 被引量:36
  • 4Hinman FJR.Atlas of urologic surgery. Second edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2002: 994-1026.
  • 5Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The results of radical nephreetomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 1969, 101: 297.
  • 6Kuczyk M, Munch T, Machtens S, et al. The need for routine adrenaleetomy during surgical treatment for renal cell cancer: the Hannover experience. BJU Int, 2002, 89: 517-522.
  • 7Paul R, Mordhorst J, Busch R, et al. Adrenal sparing surgery during radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell cancer:a new algorithm. J Urol, 2001, 166: 59-62.
  • 8Robey EL, Schellhammer PF. The adrenal gland and renal cell carcinoma: is ipsilateral adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy. J Urol, 1986, 135: 453.
  • 9Shalev M, Guille F, Cipolla B, et al. Is ipsilateral adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy. J Urol, 1995, 153: 1415-1417.
  • 10Albqami N, Janetschek G. Indications and contraindications for the use of laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol, 2006, 3:32-37.

共引文献143

同被引文献114

  • 1蔡恒,郭建军,梁荣兴,袁鹏飞.后腹腔镜结核性无功能肾切除22例临床分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(2):93-95. 被引量:2
  • 2姚友生,黄健,许可慰,黄海,江春,郭正辉,韩金利,林明恩.经腹膜后与经腹腔入路腹腔镜下侧位肾上腺手术的比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(9):587-589. 被引量:43
  • 3高江平,郭刚,朱捷,王威,徐阿祥,董隽,洪宝发.后腹腔镜肾切除术快速寻找肾血管的方法[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(3):172-174. 被引量:36
  • 4Becker A,Pradel L,Kluth L,et al.Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses:no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life[J].World J Urol.2014 May 31.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 5Wright JL,Porter JR.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches[J].J Urol,2005,174:841-845.
  • 6Berger AK,Stein RJ,Aron M,et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:a decade of evolution[J].J Endourol,2011,25:145-150.
  • 7Eskicorapci SY,Teber D,Schulze M,et al.Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy:the new gold standard surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma[J].ScientificWorldJournal,2007,7:825-836.
  • 8Okegawa T,Noda H,Horie S,et al.Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma:a single center experience of 100 cases[J].Int J Urol,2008,15:957-960.
  • 9Clayman RV,Kavoussi LR,Soper NJ,et al.Laparoscopic nephrectomy:initial case report[J].J Urol,1991,146:278-282.
  • 10Gaur DD,Agarwal DK,Purohit KC,et al.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy:initial case report[J].J Urol,1993,149:103-105.

引证文献16

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部