期刊文献+

彩色超声诊断胆总管结石的价值 被引量:5

Evaluation of color Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of choledocholithiasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨彩色超声诊断胆总管结石的价值。方法胆总管结石患者100例术中分别采用彩色超声检查和胆管造影术进行诊断,比较两种检查方法的敏感性、特异性、准确性及检查耗时。结果经手术确诊为胆总管结石90例,占90%。术中彩色超声检查正确诊断者88例,假阴性2例,无假阳性;术中胆管造影术正确诊断者87例,假阴性3例,假阳性2例;两种诊断方法的敏感性、特异性及准确性比较差异均无统计学意义(X^2=0.23、1.25、0.57,均P〉0.05)。术中彩色超声检查时间为12-28min,平均检查耗时(16.57±4.12)min;术中胆管造影术检查时间为12—37min,平均检查耗时(21.09±6.24)min;差异有统计学意义(t=6.53,P〈0.05)。随访5~12个月,无残余结石患者。结论术中彩色超声具有无创、方法简便、安全、省时、可重复性好、成功率高等优点,可为胆总管结石的主要检查手段。 Objective To explore of the color Doppler ultrasound diagnosed choledocholithiasis. Methods 100 cases with choledocholithiasis diagnosed by color ultrasonography and cholangiography were analysed retrospec- tively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and the inspection time of two methods were compared. Results 90 cases were diagnosed after operation,90% in 100 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound was 88 cases,2 false negative cases, no false positive. The diagnostic accuracy of cholangiography was 87 cases, 3 false negative cases, 2 false positive cases. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of two groups were not statistically significant ( X2 = 0. 23,1.25,0.57, P 〉 0.05 ). The inspection time of color ultrasound was 12 - 28min, the average inspection time was ( 16.57 ±4.12) min. The inspection time of cholangiography was 12 ~ 37rain,the average inspection time was (21.09 ± 6.24 ) min. The inspection times of two ways were statistically significant ( t = 6.53 ,P 〈 0. 05 ). Followed up between 5 months and 2 years,there was no residual gallstone patients. Conclusion Color Doppler ultrasound is a noninva-sire, safe, time-saving, simple, good repeatability, high successful rate, for common bile duct stones in the main exami- nation methods.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2013年第3期373-374,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 超声 多普勒 彩色 胆管造影术 胆总管结石 诊断 Uhrasonography, Doppler, color Cholangiography Choledocholithiasis Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献120

共引文献99

同被引文献51

  • 1王毅本,曾小兵,吴弛,朱瑜,刘利民.胆总管探查后一期缝合胆汁漏的临床分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2005,12(4):351-352. 被引量:24
  • 2陈方志,李国庆,钟大志,雷国英,谢珍桃,刘建梅.72例胆总管结石的诊断方法比较及治疗[J].中国医药,2007,2(7):435-436. 被引量:8
  • 3Lu J,Xiong XZ,Cheng Y,et al. One-stage versus two-stage man- agement for concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones in patients with obstructive jaundice [ J ]. Am Surg,2013, 79(11) :1142-1148.
  • 4McMahon CJ. The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangio- pancreatography(MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi : a critically appraised topic [ J ]. Ab- dom Imaging,2008,33 ( 1 ) :6-9.
  • 5Targarona EM, Bendahan GE. Management of common bile duct stones : controversies and future perspectives [ J ]. HPB ( Oxford), 2004,6(3) :140-143.
  • 6Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, et al. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic uhrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomo-graphic cholangiography[ J]. Eur J Radiol, 2005,54 ( 2 ) : 271- 275.
  • 7Carr-Locke DL. Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002,56(6 Suppl) :S170-S174.
  • 8Targarona EM, Bendahan GE. Management of common bile duct stones : controversies and future perspectives [ J ]. HPB ( Oxford), 2004,6 ( 3 ) : 140-143.
  • 9Ahmed I,Pradhan C, Beckingham IJ, et al. Is a T-tube necessary after common bile duct exploration [ J ]. World J Surg, 2008,32 (7) : 1485-1488.
  • 10Zhang WJ,Xu GF,Wu GZ,et al. Laparoscopic exploration of com- mon bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage:a ran- domized clinical trial[J]. J Surg Res,2009,157( 1 ) :el-e5.

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部