期刊文献+

水、旱稻差异表达抗旱候选基因的序列分析

Sequence analysis of drought-tolerance related genes differentially expressed in lowland and upland rice
原文传递
导出
摘要 为研究在水、旱稻差异表达的抗旱候选基因、解释旱稻抗旱的分子机理,本研究选取已获得的水、旱稻干旱胁迫处理基因表达谱中在旱稻中高表达的候选基因,对其编码区和启动子区进行测序分析,以期比较可能的抗旱相关基因在水、旱稻基因组水平上的异同。根据水、旱稻差异表达结果,筛选出8个旱稻高表达基因。通过测序分析发现7个基因在水、旱稻间没有差异,只有一个候选基因OsMIP在典型水稻(日本晴、越富)和典型旱稻(IRAT109、毫格劳)启动子区之间存在18个SNP和1个Deletion的序列差异,说明在干旱胁迫下,旱稻高表达基因中只有少数存在序列上的差异。为进一步验证OsMIP的启动子区在水、旱稻间的序列差异,利用国内、外86份水、旱稻材料对该基因的启动子区进行测序分析,所得到的所有启动子序列可分为4种单倍型H1、H2、H3和H4,在单倍型H2中获得与抗旱相关的8个SNP和1个Indel,推测该基因的启动子区域的一个或多个序列差异可能是引起水、旱稻OsMIP基因差异表达的原因。 Selection of high expression genes in UR being potential drought resistant genes was performed in order to study the high expression molecular mechanism in UR. The coding region and promoter sequence of each candidate gene were analyzed to compare differences of the genome in drought-related gene. In this study,eight highly expressed genes in UR were selected in UR according to the previous results. The sequencing results showed that there was no differences among seven of the eight candidate genes, but one gene, OsMIP, had differences with 18 SNPs and one deletion in its promoter region between the LR (Nipponbare and Yuefu) and UR (IRAT109 and Haogelao). It suggested that only minority sequence differences existed in the drought-tolerance related genes which differentially expressed in UR and LR (highly expressed in UR) under the drought stress. Further sequence analysis with 86 varieties from local and abroad identified four haplotypes (H1, H2, H3 and H4) . In the H2 haplotype, eight SNPs and one Indel in OsMIP promoter region were novel in UR. So,these SNPs and deletion may be related to drought tolerance thus may cause the genes expressed differently in UR and LR.
出处 《中国农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期9-16,共8页 Journal of China Agricultural University
基金 国家"973"计划项目(2010CB125904) 国家自然科学基金NSFC-IRRI重大国际合作研究项目(31061140458)
关键词 水稻 抗旱 候选基因 DNA序列 rice drought resistance candidate genes DNA sequence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1高凤华,张洪亮,王海光,高宏,李自超.应用cDNA-AFLP比较干旱胁迫条件下水稻和旱稻转录本表达谱[J].科学通报,2009,54(16):2305-2319. 被引量:5
  • 2Wang H,Zhang H,Gao F. Comparison of gene expression between upland and lowland rice cultivars under water stress using cDNA microarray[J].Theoretical and Applied Genetics,2007,(8):1109-1126.doi:10.1007/s00122-007-0637-7.
  • 3Park S,Yi N,Kim Y. Analysis of five novel putative constitutive gene promoters in transgenic rice plants[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2010,(09):2459-2467.doi:10.1093/jxb/erq076.
  • 4Sasaki K,Mitsuhara I,Seo S. Two novel AP2/ERF domain proteins interact with cis-element VWRE for woundinduced expression of the Tobacco tpoxN1 gene[J].Plant Journal,2007.1079-1092.
  • 5Yamaguchi-shinozaki K,Shinozaki K. Organization of cis-acting regulatory elements in osmotic-and cold-stress-responsive promoters[J].Trends in Plant Science,2005,(02):88-94.doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.012.
  • 6Chaumont F,Barrieu F,Wojcik E. Aquaporins constitute a large and highly divergent protein family in maize[J].Plant Physiology,2001,(3):1206-1215.doi:10.1104/pp.125.3.1206.
  • 7Mariaux J B,Bockel C,Salamini F. Desiccation-and abscisic acid-responsive genes encoding major intrinsic proteins (MIPs) from the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum[J].Plant Molecular Biology,1998.1089-1099.
  • 8Shinozaki K,Yamaguchi-shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature:Differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2000,(3):217-223.
  • 9Fujita M,Fujita Y,Noutoshi Y. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses:a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2006,(4):436-442.doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.014.
  • 10Valliyodan B,Nguyen H T. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2006,(2):189-195.doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019.

二级参考文献5

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部