摘要
目的了解上海市一线卫生监督员各类证据使用的实际情况。方法抽取一线卫生监督员342人,采用问卷调查形式进行研究。结果现场检查笔录、当事人陈述两种类型使用率接近100%,书证和证人证言使用率在85%以上,物证使用率为60%,摄像、录音等采集证据手段使用率在10%以下。结论证据使用类型总体上分布不均,客观证据有待强化;不同工作年限卫生监督员的证据类型各有特点,需要分类引导;部分证据类型分布有明显的岗位差异,需根据专业特性有的放矢。
Objective To understand the actual situation of health supervisor' s use of evidence. Method Select 342 health supervisors to take questionnaire. Result The utilization rate of on-site inspection recording and statements of the parties is almost 100%, the utilization rate of documentary evidence and testimony of witnesses is over 85%, the utilization rate of exhibit is 60% and the utilization rate of video or recording etc. Other means is below 10%. Conclusion The use of types of evidence generally has uneven distribution and objective evidence is to be strengthened; different years that health supervisors work for have different types of evidence which needs classification guide; some types of evidence distribution have obvious position differences which based on professional characteristics.
出处
《中国卫生监督杂志》
2013年第1期21-25,共5页
Chinese Journal of Health Inspection
基金
上海市卫生局卫生政策研究课题(卫生行政处罚调查取证规则实证研究)资助项目(项目编:2010HP015)
关键词
卫生监督
证据使用
证据类型
Health supervision
Use of evidence
Evidence type