期刊文献+

基于博弈的云计算任务分解研究 被引量:3

Study of Cloud Computing Task Factoring Based on Game Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 云用户在同时拥有本地资源和云计算资源时,如何在二者之间进行任务分解,以最短化任务完成时间是云用户的一个优化决策问题。研究云用户的最优任务分解决策。针对云计算资源的共享特征,用户之间的决策会影响其余用户的任务完成时间;因此通过求解纳什均衡的方法来分析用户的策略行为,从而决定用户的最优决策。求解了大任务和小任务两类用户时的纳什均衡,并通过仿真给出了在不同大小任务量比、云资源本地资源速度比和大任务用户概率时云用户的最优决策。 Task factoring to shortest of task completion time among local resources and cloud computing resources is the cloud users optimized decision problem, if cloud users can use the aforementioned two resources at the same time, and this paper studies cloud users optimal task factoring decision. Because of the sharing characters of cloud computing resources, users decision-making will affect the task completion time of the rest users, and so solving the Nash equilibrium strategy to analyze the users’ behavior and to determine the optimal decision-making are proposed. Nash equilibrium is solved when the two types of users with big tasks and small tasks are adopted, and the cloud users’ optimal decision is proposed through simulation when different ratio of big and small tasks’ workload, different ratio of local and cloud execution speed, and different probability of big task users are given respectively.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2013年第5期1215-1218,共4页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61170029) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y1111000 Y1090255)资助
关键词 任务分解 云计算 博弈 纳什均衡 task factoring cloud computing game theory Nash equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Koh Y, Knauerhase R, Brett P, et al. An analysis of performance in- terference effects in virtual environments. IEEE International Sympo- sium on Per-formance Analysis of Systems and Software ( ISPASS), July 2007:200-209.
  • 2Zhang H, Jiang G, Yoshihira K, et al. Intelligent workload factoring for a hybrid cloud computing model. IEEE 7th International Confer- ence on Web Service (ICWS 2009 ), July 2009:701-708.
  • 3Ditarso P, Figueiredo F, Maia D, et al. On the planning of a hybrid it infrastructure. Proceedings of Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2008 : 496-503.
  • 4Ardagna D, Panicucci B, Passacantando M. A game theoretic formu- lation of the service provisioning problem in cloud systems. Proceed- ings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2011 : 177-186.
  • 5李明欣,陈山枝,谢东亮,胡博,时岩.异构无线网络中基于非合作博弈论的资源分配和接入控制[J].软件学报,2010,21(8):2037-2049. 被引量:37
  • 6林晓鹏,郭东辉.基于进化博弈的网格资源分配方法的研究[J].计算机仿真,2011,28(3):155-158. 被引量:2
  • 7Nahir A, Orda A, Raz D. Workload factoring with the cloud: a game-theoretic perspective. INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE, March 2012:25-30.

二级参考文献13

  • 1陶军,吴清亮,吴强.基于非合作竞价博弈的网络资源分配算法的应用研究[J].电子学报,2006,34(2):241-246. 被引量:19
  • 21 Foster, C Kesselman. The Grid: Blueprint for a new Computing Infrastructure[ M]. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fransisco, CA, 1999.
  • 3L Peng, et al. Performance evaluation in computational grid environments[ C]. High Performance Computing and Gird in Asia Pacific, 2004.54-62.
  • 4J F Nash. Non-Cooperative games[ M]. Annals of Mathematics, 1951,54(2) :286-295.
  • 5C A Waldspurger, et al. Spawn: A distributed computational economy [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Feb. 1992, 18(2) : 103-177.
  • 6R Buyya, et al. Economic Models for Resource Management and Scheduling in Grid Computing [ J ]. The Journal of Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE), Wiley Press, May 2002.
  • 7Hang Qin, Lin Qiu. A Game-Theoretic Resource Allocation Strategy with Purification Approach for Computational Grids[ J]. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technology Application 1:2, 2008:65-71.
  • 8Jorgen W Weibull. Evolutionary Game Theory [ M ]. The MIT Press, 1996.
  • 9艾里克拉斯缪森.博弈与信息:博弈论概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
  • 10I Rechenberg. Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem[ M]. Roy Airer Establ, libr transl 1222 Hants. UK:Farnborough, 1965.

共引文献37

同被引文献18

  • 1Wang Xu, Wang Beizhan, Huang Jing. Cloud computingand its key techniques [C]. 2011 IEEE International Confer- ence on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), 2011:404-410.
  • 2BHARDWAJ S, JAIN L, JAIN S. Cloud computing: a study of infrastructure as a service (IAAS)[J]. International Journal of Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 2(1): 60-63.
  • 3Zhang Hong, Li Bo, Jiang Hongbo, et al. A framework for truthful online auctions in cloud computing with heteroge- neous user demands[C]. INFOCOM 2013 Proceedings IEEE, 2013 : 1510-1518.
  • 4NAHIR A, ORDA A, RAZ D. Workload Factoring with the cloud: a game-theoretic perspective [C]. INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE, 2012:2566-2570.
  • 5OSTERMANN S, IOSUP A, YIGITBASI N, et al. A per- formance analysis of EC2 cloud computing services for sci- entific computing[C]. Cloud Computing[A]. Berlin Heidelberg Springer, 2010,34:115-131.
  • 6JAIN N, MENACHE I, NAOR J S, et al. A truthful mech- anism for value-based scheduling in cloud computing[C]. Algorithmic Game Theory [A]. Berlin Heidelberg Springer, 2011,6982 : 178-189.
  • 7HU Y, WONG J, ISZLAI G, et al. Resource provisioning for cloud Computing[C]. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Re- search, ACM, 2009: 101-111.
  • 8Niu Di, Feng Chen, Li Baochun. A theory of cloud band- width pricing for video-on-demand providers[C]. INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE, 2012 : 711-719.
  • 9Wei Guiyi, VASILAKOS A V, Zheng Yao, et al. A game- theoretic method of fair resource allocation for cloud comput- ing services [J]. Journal of Supercomputing, 2010, 54(2): 252-269.
  • 10KOUTSOUPIAS E, PAPADIMITRIOU C. Worst-case equi- libria [C]. STACS 99, Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 1999, 1563 : 404-413.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部