期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术对不同年龄段患者的疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparison of the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy between elder and middle age
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价与比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)对老年及中青年患者疗效的差异。方法选择2006—2011年因胆囊疾病行LC的患者388例,按年龄分为〈65岁组(中青年组)353例和≥65岁组(老年组)35例,比较两组患者手术时间、手术中转率、术后并发症、禁食时间、下床时间及术后住院时间,再将两组患者按病情轻重分为简单性胆囊疾病(复发性胆绞痛、慢性胆囊炎、胆囊息肉)和复杂性胆囊疾病(急性胆囊炎、胆囊积脓、急性胆囊炎穿孔)。分别比较不同病情患者年龄、术前白细胞计数(WBC)、手术时间、并发症及术后住院时间。结果两组手术时间、手术中转率、术后并发症、禁食时间、下床时间及术后住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。简单性胆囊疾病及复杂性胆囊疾病行LC的患者在年龄及手术中转率方面比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但简单性胆囊疾病术前WBC、手术时间、并发症及术后住院时间均优于复杂性胆囊疾病[(7.32±2.12)×10^9/L,比(11.35±4.62)×10^9/L、(62.3±29.5)min比(79.5±49.2)min、3.1%(10/322)比9.8%(5/51)和(5.0±3.7)d比(7.9±6.5)d,P〈0.01或〈0.05]。结论年龄不是影响LC应用于老年患者的因素,但疾病本身病情轻重对手术有明显影响。 Objective To evaluate the curative difference of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between elder and middle age. Methods Patients with gallbladder disease who underwent LC from 2006 to 2011 were collected and divided into elder group ( ≥65 years old, 35 patients) and middle age group( 〈 65 years old, 353 patients ). The operation time, conversion rate, postoperative complications, time to first oral intake, time to first ambulation and hospitalization time were compared. These patients were divided into simple gallbladder disease group (included recurrent biliary colic , chronic cholecystitis, gallbladder polyps ) and the complex gallbladder disease group (included acute cholecystitis, gallbladder empyema, acute cholecystitis perforation). The age,WBC, operation time,postoperative complicantions and hospitalization time were evaluated. Results The operation time, conversion, postoperative complications rate, time to first oral intake, time to first ambulation and hospitalization time had no significant difference between elder group and middle age group (P 〉 0.05 ). The age, conversion rate between simple gallbladder disease group and complex gallbladder disease group had no significant difference (P 〉 0.05 ). But the WBC, operation time, postoperative complications, hospitalization time in simple gallbladder disease group had significant difference compared with complex gallbladder disease group [ (7.32± 2.12) × 10^9/L vs. (11.35 ±4.62) × 10^9/L, (62.3 ± 29.5) min vs. (79.5 ±49.2) rain,3.1%(10/322) vs. 9.8%(5/51), (5.0 ± 3.7) d vs.(7.9 ± 6.5) d,P 〈 0.01 or 〈 0.05 ]. Conclusions Age is not the risk factor of LC in elderly patients, but the disease type has a significant effect on the choice of LC.
作者 林苗 缪金透
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2013年第5期22-25,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 胆囊疾病 Laparoscopes Cholecystectomy Gallbladder diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Williams LF Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg, 1993, 165(4) : 459-465.
  • 2沈朝敏,张国强.开腹手术与腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效比较分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2012,35(14):51-52. 被引量:9
  • 3黄志强.当今胆道外科的发展与方向[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(23):1585-1586. 被引量:90
  • 4Utsumi M, Shimizu J, Miyamoto A, et al. Age as an independent risk factor for surgical site infections in a large gastrointestinal surgery cohort in Japan. J Hosp Infect, 2010, 75 ( 3 ) : 183-187.
  • 5Zdichavsky M, Bashin YA, Blumenstock G, et al. Impact of risk factors for prolonged operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. EurJ Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 24(9): 1033-1038.
  • 6Perez Lara FJ, de Luna Dlaz R, Moreno Ruiz J, et al. Laparoseopie eholecystectomy in patients over 70 years of age:review of 176 cases. Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 2006, 98( 1 ) : 42-48.
  • 7Persson G, Stromberg J, Svennblad B, et al. Risk of bleeding associated with use of systemic thromboembolic prophylaxis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BrJ Surg, 2012, 99(7) : 979-986.
  • 8Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: applicability in the geriatric population. Am Surg, 1997, 63( 1 ): 91-96.
  • 9朱锦腾,刘衍民,塔长峰,马腾飞,庞健,王德俊.老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2006,29(4):35-36. 被引量:5
  • 10Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, et al. Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis.Int J Surg, 2011, 9(5) : 392-399.

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘嘉林,周汉新,余小舫,鲍世韵,李明岳,佘志红,熊奕,彭启慧.超声在腹腔镜胆囊切除术前诊断腹腔粘连的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2005,14(11):833-835. 被引量:13
  • 2王宏光,陈训如,罗丁,毛静熙,周正东,余少明,李胜宏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术13000例的并发症分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(3):167-168. 被引量:94
  • 3巴明臣,崔书中,陈积圣.我国胆道外科的现状与发展思路[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(4):329-330. 被引量:22
  • 4Rosen M,Brody F,Ponsky J.Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Am J Surg,2002,184:254-258.
  • 5Karayiannakis J A,Polychronidis A,Perente S,et al.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patientS with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery[J].Surg Endosc,2004,18:97-101.
  • 6Madan A K,Aliabadi-Wahle S,Dona Te.si,et al.How early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis[J].Am J Surg,2002,183:232-236.
  • 7Zhang W J,Li J M,Wu G Z,et al.Risk factors affecting conversion in patients undergoing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].ANZ J Surg.2008,78:973-976.
  • 8Ibrahim S,Hean TK,Ho LS,et al.Risk Factors for Conversion to Open Surgery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy[J].World J Surg,2006,30:1 698-1 704.
  • 9Edwards C, Bradshaw A, Ahearne P, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases. Surg Endosc,2010, 24(9) : 2241-2247.
  • 10Calero Garc i a P, Ruiz Tovar J, Sanjuanbenito Dehesa A, et al. Acute cholecystitis: is it still justified to delay surgery? Cir Esp, 2010,88(2):92-96.

共引文献111

同被引文献53

引证文献5

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部