期刊文献+

基于Mixed Logit模型的路线选择行为量化分析 被引量:7

Quantitative analysis of traveler route choice behavior based on Mixed Logit model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨路况信息动态变化对出行路线选择行为的影响程度,采用正交试验法设计出行意愿调查问卷,针对有驾车经验的出行者进行调查。假定时间参数和费用参数为常数、费用参数服从正态分布和对数正态分布,分别建立了出行路线选择的Logit模型和Mixed Logit模型,并对解释变量影响路线改变倾向进行了量化分析。结果表明,Mixed Logit模型的最大似然值、优度比和命中率都高于Logit模型。出行者对行程时间和时间信息动态变化的敏感程度十分接近,敏感度最高的是出行费用。个人属性中的年龄、驾龄和收入是影响路线选择行为的最显著因素。 To explore the effect of the urban road traffic dynamics on the traveler route choice behavior, a stated preference survey questionnaire was designed using the orthogonal design method. The survey was conducted with the travelers with driving experience in Dalian city. With the time parameter and the cost parameter fixed as well as the cost parameter obeying the normal distribution and lognormal distribution, a Logit model and a Mixed Logit model were built for the route choice analysis, and a quantitative analysis was performed for the route change trend caused by variables. The model estimation results indicated that the maximum likelihood, the values of goodness-of-fit index, and hit ratio of the Mixed Logit model are better than those of the Logit model. The traveler sensitivity for the travel time and dynamic change of time information are similar, and the most sensitive parameter is the travel cost. The traveler age, years of driving experience and income are the most significant factors affecting the route choice behavior.
作者 周伟 赵胜川
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期304-309,共6页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50978046)
关键词 交通运输工程 路线选择 动态路况信息 MIXED LOGIT模型 敏感度 意愿调查 engineering of communications and transportation route choice dynamic road traffic information Mixed Logit model sensitivity stated preference survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘晓明,饶翚,童永.基于网格任务调度的Monte Carlo仿真建模[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2007,25(1):116-120. 被引量:2
  • 2Calfeea John, Winstonb Clifford. The value of automobile travel time: implications for congestion policy [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1998, 69: 83- 102.
  • 3Lam Terence C, Small Kenneth A. The value of time and reliability: measurement from a value pricing experiment [J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2001, 37:231-251.
  • 4Brownstone David, Ghosh Arindam, van Amelsfort Dirk. Drivers willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: evidence from the San Diego Ⅰ-15 congestion pricing project[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2003, 37:373-387.
  • 5Brownstone David, Small Kenneth A. Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations[ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 2005, 39:279-293.
  • 6Truong P, Hensher David A. Measurement of travel time values and opportunity cost from a discretechoice model[J]. The Economic Journal, 1985, 95 (37) :438-451.
  • 7Train Kenneth E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 8Hensher David A, Greene William H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice[J]. Transportation, 2006, 30:133-176.
  • 9Mood A M, Graybill F A, Boes D C. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill Press, 1974.
  • 10McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5) : 447 -470.

共引文献80

同被引文献47

  • 1徐维军,徐寅峰,卢致杰,徐金红.占线决策问题及竞争分析方法[J].系统工程,2005,23(5):106-110. 被引量:19
  • 2苏兵,徐寅峰.堵塞恢复时间随机的在线加拿大旅行者问题[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(10):108-113. 被引量:10
  • 3Pigou A C. Wealth and welfare[M]. London:MacMil lan, 1920.
  • 4Xie L T, Olszewski P. Modelling the effects of road pricing on traffic using ERP traffic data[J]. Trans- portation Research Part A, 2011,45 (6) : 512-522.
  • 5May A D, Milne D S. Effects of alternative road pri- cing systems on network performance[J]. Transporta- tion Research Part A,2000,34(5) :407-436.
  • 6Kristoffersson I. Impacts of time-varying cordon pri- cing: Validation and application of mesoscopic model for Stockholm[J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 28 (6): 51- 60.
  • 7Li Z, Hensher D A. Congestion charging and car use: A review of stated preference and opinion studies and market monitoring evidence [J]. Transport Policy, 2012,20(2) :47 -61.
  • 8Tillema T,Ben-Elia E, Ettema D, et al. Charging ver- sus rewarding: A comparison of road-pricing and re- warding peak avoidance in the Netherlands[J].Trans- port Policy,2013,26(3):4-14.
  • 9Bhat C R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likeli- hood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2001,35(2): 677-693.
  • 10Bhat C. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level of-service variables in Travel mode choice models[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 1980,32 (7):455-507.

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部