期刊文献+

增长机会、业绩风险与上市公司管理层薪酬业绩敏感度 被引量:1

Growth Opportunity, Performance Risk and Pay Performance Sensitivity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2005-2007年上市公司数据为基础,分析了业绩风险与薪酬业绩敏感度之间的关系。结果发现,经典委托代理理论关于业绩风险与薪酬激励强度负相关的结论没有得到稳定的支持。公司增长机会显著影响上述关系,表现为对于增长机会很小或没有增长机会的公司而言,业绩风险与薪酬业绩敏感度负相关;而对于增长机会大的公司而言,业绩风险与薪酬业绩敏感度正相关。表明基于节约激励成本的角度,蕴含较大增长机会的上市公司更适合股权与期权的激励方式。 How to match the performance risk and incentive is essential to the design of managerial compensation.We examine a sample of managerial compensation provided from the Chinese listed companies from 2005 to 2007. Based on the sample, we address the relationship between performance risk and pay performance sensitivity. Our evidence indicates that the negative relationship between performance risk and pay performance sensitivity predicted by Principal-agent Theory does not gets stable support. Moreover, we also find the growth opportunity affects the relationship significantly. pay performance sensitivity decreases as the performance risk increases in the companies with small growth opportunity, while the pay performance sensitivity turns to be positive to the performance risk in the companies with bigger growth opportunity. From the perspective of saving incentive costs, the companies with bigger growth opportunity are more suitable for equity incentive.
作者 洪峰
出处 《财会通讯(下)》 2013年第2期35-38,129,共4页 Communication of Finance and Accounting
基金 北方工业大学“会计学专业系列课程教学团队”及北京市特色专业建设“北方工业大学会计学专业”阶段性成果
关键词 增长机会 业绩风险 薪酬业绩敏感度 Growth opportunity Performance risk Pay performance sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献68

共引文献144

同被引文献25

  • 1周嘉南,黄登仕.上市公司高级管理层报酬业绩敏感度与风险之间关系的实证检验[J].会计研究,2006(4):44-50. 被引量:80
  • 2鲁海帆.高管团队内部货币薪酬差距与公司业绩关系研究——来自中国A股市场的经验证据[J].南方经济,2007,36(4):34-44. 被引量:60
  • 3Fama E F, Jensen M C. Separation of ownership and control[ J ]. Journal of law and economics, 1983:301 -325.
  • 4Jensen M C, Murphy K J. Performance pay and top-management incentives [ J]. Journal of political economy,1990:225 -264.
  • 5Ciscel D H, Carroll T M. The determinants of executive salaries: An econometric survey [ J ]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1980:7 - 13.
  • 6Murphy K J. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration : An empirical analysis [ J ]. Joumal of accounting and economics, 1985, 7(1) :11 -42.
  • 7Harvey K D, Shrieves R E. Executive compensation structure and corporate govemance choices[ J]. Joumal of Financial Research,2001, 24(4) :495 -512.
  • 8Mengistae T, Xu L C. Agency theory and executive compensation: the case of Chinese state-owned enterprises[ J ]. Journal of Labor Eco- nomics ,2004,22 ( 3 ) :615 - 637.
  • 9Baker G P. Discussion of an analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts [ J ]. Joumal of Accounting research, 1987 : 126 - 129.
  • 10Mishra C S, McConaughy D L, Gobeli D H. Effectiveness of CEO pay-for-performance[ J]. Review of Financial Economics ,2000,9 ( 1 ) : 1 -13.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部