期刊文献+

骨性结构参数的不对称变化在腰椎侧凸角度进展中的意义 被引量:1

Significance of asymmetry variation of bony construction parameters in the progress of lumbar scoliosis angle
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨骨性结构参数的不对称变化在腰椎侧凸角度进展中的意义。方法回顾性分析2006年4月至2012年4月,就诊于我院门诊及住院治疗的56例诊断为退变性腰椎侧凸患者的影像学资料。侧凸角度>30°的32例患者为轻度侧凸组,侧凸角度<30°的24例患者为重度侧凸组,测量并比较两组患者的骨性结构参数:凸凹侧平均椎间高度、平均椎体高度、平均关节突矢状角、顶椎旋转度。采用多元线性回归分析侧凸角度与骨性结构参数变化的相关性。结果所有病例凸凹侧骨性结构参数之间均存在着差异,平均椎间盘高度及平均椎体高度凸侧高于凹侧,平均关节角度凸侧大于凹侧。重度侧凸组的椎间不对称度、椎体不对称度、关节角不对称度、顶椎旋转度及侧凸角度均大于轻度侧凸组,差异有统计学意义(t椎间=12.1,t椎体=10.7,t关节=4.6,t顶锥=9.3,t侧凸角=5.9;P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析得出,轻度侧凸组的回归方程:Cobb's角=11.041+1.186椎间不对称度-0.372椎体不对称度+0.128关节角不对称度,重度侧凸组的回归方程:Cobb's角=14.525+0.736椎间不对称度+4.016椎体不对称度+1.331关节角不对称度+0.442顶椎旋转度。结论退变性腰椎侧凸的凸凹侧之间骨性结构参数存在着差异,且不对称度随着侧凸角度的增加而增大。当侧凸角度<30°时,侧凸角度主要受到椎间盘不对称退变的影响;侧凸角度>30°时,侧凸角度主要受到椎体不对称退变的影响。 Objective To investigate the significance of asymmetry variation of bony construction parameters in the progress of lumbar scoliosis angle. Methods The imaging data of 56 patient diagnosed as degenerative lumbar scoliosis in the clinic and being hospitalized in our hospital from April 2006 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. 32 patients with the Cobb’s angle of less than 30° were selected as light scoliosis group, and 24 patients with the Cobb’s angle of more than 30° were selected as severe scoliosis group. The bony construction parameters were measured and compared between the 2 groups, including the mean intervertebral height between the concave side and the convex side, the mean vertebral height, the mean sagittal angle of the articular process and the apical vertebral rotation. The correlation between the Cobb’s angle and the changes of bony construction parameters were analyzed by using the multiple linear regression. Results There were significant differences in the bony construction parameters between the concave side and the convex side in all patients. The mean disc height and vertebral height were higher in the convex side than that in the concave side, and the mean articular angle was larger in the convex side than that in the concave side. The asymmetry degrees of intervertebral height, vertebral height and articular angle, apical vertebral rotation and Cobb’s angle in the severe scoliosis group were larger than that in the light scoliosis group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=12.1 [intervertebral height], t=10.7 [vertebral height], t=4.6 [articular angle], t=9.3 [apical vertebral rotation], t=5.9 [Cobb’s angle]; P〈0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis showed the equation in the light scoliosis group was the Cobb’s angle=11.041+1.186 asymmetry degree of intervertebral height-0.372 asymmetry degree of vertebral height+0.128 asymmetry degree of articular angle, and the equation in the severe scoliosis group was the Cobb’s angle=14.525+0.736 asymmetry degree of intervertebral height+4.016 asymmetry degree of vertebral height+1.331 asymmetry degree of articular angle+0.442 apical vertebral rotation. Conclusions Differences in the bony construction parameters between the concave side and the convex side exist in the patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, and the asymmetry degree becomes larger with the increasing of the Cobb’s angle. When the Cobb’s angle is less than 30°, disc asymmetrical degeneration is the main factor influencing the scoliosis angle. When the Cobb’s angle is more than 30°, vertebral asymmetrical degeneration is the main factor.
出处 《中国骨与关节杂志》 CAS 2013年第2期65-69,共5页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
关键词 骨性结构参数 腰椎退变性侧凸 不对称退变 Bony construction parameter Degenerative lumbar scoliosis Asymmetrical degeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1丁文元,吴海龙,申勇,张为,李宝俊,孙亚澎,郭金库,曹来震.退变性脊柱侧凸椎间盘-终板退变与骨性结构参数的相关性研究及意义[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(12):1123-1127. 被引量:14
  • 2Peterson LE,Nacheson AL. Prediction of progression of the curve in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of moderate severity[J].{H}Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1995,(06):823-827.
  • 3Marinelli NL,Haughton VM,Munoz A. T2 relaxation times of intervertebral disc tissue correlated with water content and proteoglycan content[J].{H}SPINE,2009.520-524.
  • 4丁文元,曹来震,申勇,张为,王林峰,李宝俊,孙亚澎,郭金库.退变性腰椎侧凸形成和发展的相关因素分析[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(5):404-408. 被引量:19
  • 5Faldini C,Pagkrati S,Grandi G,et a1. Degenerative lumbar sco1iosis:features and surgical treatment[J].{H}JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY,2006,(02):67-71.
  • 6Kobayashi T,Atsuta Y,Takemitsu M. A prospective study of De Novo scoliosis in a community based cohort[J].{H}SPINE,2006,(02):178-182.
  • 7Murata Y,Takahashi K,Hanaoka E,et a1. Changes in scoliotic curvature and lordotic angle during the early phase of degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J].{H}SPINE,2002,(20):2268-2273.
  • 8Daffner SD,Vaccaro AR. Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J].{H}American Journal of Orthopedics,2003,(02):77-82.
  • 9Roaf R. Theoretical bases of treatment of scoliosis. A new method of blocking and correction with a plate[J].{H}Minerva Ortopedica,1970,(04):289-294.
  • 10Wu HL,Ding WY,Shen Y. Prevalence of vertebral endplate modic changes in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its associated factors analysis[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2012,(23):1958-1964.

二级参考文献44

  • 1楼才俊,陈其昕,李方才,王扬生.腰椎间盘髓核退变的MRI表现与病理学的相关性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):531-535. 被引量:32
  • 2韩永珍,张家文,陈菊春.正常腰椎及腰椎退行性滑脱症椎间小关节角度的研究[J].安徽医科大学学报,2005,40(4):340-342. 被引量:3
  • 3Weinstein SL,Dolan LA,Spratt KF,et al. Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis:a 50-year natural history study[J].JAMA, 2003,289 (5) : 559-567.
  • 4Jackson RP,Simmons EH,Stripinis D. Incidence and severity of back pain in adult idiopathie scoliosis[J].Spine,1983,8 (7) :749-756.
  • 5Mayo NE,Goldberg MS,Poitras B,et al. The Ste-Justine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cohort study (Part Ⅲ ):back pain [J].Spine, 1998, 19(14) : 1573-1581.
  • 6Lenke LG,Betz RR,Harms J,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83 (8) : 1169-1181.
  • 7Aaro S,Dahalborn M.Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography[J].Spine, 1981,6 (5) : 460-467.
  • 8Frymoyer JW,Selby DK.Segmental instability:rationale for treatment[J].Spine, 1985,10(3 ) : 280-286.
  • 9Rosenow DE. Does neural blockade and other neurosurgical modalities offer a durable pain relief for spinal disorders[J]? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 2002,16 ( 1 ) : 155-164.
  • 10Sato H,Kikuchi S. The natural history of radiographic instability of the lumbar spine[J].Spine, 1993,18(14) :2075-2079.

共引文献34

同被引文献18

  • 1王岩.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的微创治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):995-998. 被引量:83
  • 2中华医学会骨科学分会.骨质疏松骨折诊疗指南(2008版)[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,:1001-1003.
  • 3Kanis JA, MeCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX--assessment and inter- vention thresholds for the UK [J]. Osteoporos lnt, 2008, 19(10): 1395-1408.
  • 4Melton L.I 3rd. How many women have osteoporosis now [J]? J Bone Miner Res, 1995, 10(2): 175-177.
  • 5Daubs MD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for treatment of degener- ative lumbar scoliosis in the elderly patient[J]. Evid Based Spine Care J, 2012, 3(4): 27-32.
  • 6Li FC, Chen QX, Chen WS, et al. Posterolateral lumbar fusion ver- sus transforaminal lumbar interbndy fusion for the treatment of de- generative lumbar scoliosis [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2013, 20(9): 1241-1245.
  • 7Ha KY, Son JM, Im JH, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after surgical correction of degenerative lumbar sco- liosis[J ]. Indian J Orthop, 2013, 47(4): 346-351.
  • 8Vanderpool DW, james Jl, Wynne-Davies R. Seoliosis in the el- derly[J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969, 51(3): 446-455.
  • 9Daffner SD,Vaccaro AR. Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2003, 32(2): 77-82.
  • 10Weidenbaum M. Considerations for focused surgical interventionin the presence of adult spinal deformity [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(19 Suppl): S139-143.

引证文献1

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部