期刊文献+

中国选择二氧化碳强度减排目标是否合适——基于不确定性视角的分析

On Appropriateness of Choosing Intensity Target of CO_2 Emissions Reduction by China——Analysis from Perspective of Uncertainty Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 控制二氧化碳减排成本的不确定性是制定减排政策的重要考虑因素之一。从不确定性的角度出发,比较二氧化碳排放总量目标与强度目标,如果二氧化碳排放波动与经济波动之间存在一定关联,且减排幅度足够大,采用强度目标的形式,能够通过对排放上限的调整减少减排数量的波动。实证研究发现,我国GDP偏离长期趋势1%,可能导致二氧化碳排放量偏离趋势约0.63%。我国在哥本哈根世界气候大会中提出的到2020年二氧化碳排放强度比2005年下降40%—45%的目标,与相应的总量目标相比,所带来的减排成本不确定性较小。 To control the uncertainty of the costs of CO2 emissions reduction is one of the key considera tions for the establishment of mitigation policy. The paper compares the total emission target with the intensity target from perspective of uncertainty theory. It is found that if there is some link between the fluctuation in e missions and the fluctuation in GDP and range of the emissions reduction is large enough, the intensity target can lower the fluctuation of the emissions reduction quantity through adjustment of the emissions ceilings. The empirical study shows that in China, if the GDP deviates from its longterm trend by 1%, the CO2 emissions may deviate from the trend by 0.63%. Under this correlation, the intensity target, to make the CO2 emission intensity drop by 40% to 45% from 2005 to 2020, proposed by Chinese government in Copenhagen Conference in 2009 will bring a smaller uncertainty in emissions reduction costs, compared to a corresponding fixed target
作者 周慧
出处 《阅江学刊》 2013年第1期36-44,共9页 Yuejiang Academic Journal
基金 江苏省教育厅2010年高校哲学社会科学基金"气候变化背景下产业碳减排的动态目标规制"(2010SJB790024) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(环境管理技术及政策研究)
关键词 二氧化碳减排 强度目标 总量目标 不确定性 CO2 emissions reduction intensity target total target uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Wing I. S. , A.D. Ellerman and J. Song. Absolute vs. Intensity Limits for CO2 Emission Control : Performance Under Uncertain-ty[ R]. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 130, 2006.
  • 2何建坤.我国CO_2减排目标的经济学分析与效果评价[J].科学学研究,2011,29(1):9-17. 被引量:14
  • 3相伟.碳排放强度视野下的中国经济“低碳化”[J].城市管理与科技,2010,12(6):8-12. 被引量:4
  • 4Herzog, T. , K.A. Baumert and J. Pershing. Target: Intensi- ty: An Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Intensity Targets [ R ]. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. , 2006.
  • 5Newell R. G. and W. A. Pizer. Indexed Regulation[ J. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2008, (56).
  • 6Holland S. P. Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second- Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regula- tion (Leakage) or Market Power [ P ]. NBER Working Paper, 2009.
  • 7Kolstad, C.D. The Simple Analytics of Greenhouse Gas Emis- sion Intensity Reduction Targets [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2005, (33).Jotzo F. , J. C. Pezzey. Optimal Intensity Targets for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading under Uncertainty[ J]. En- vironmental Resource Economics ,2007, (38).
  • 8Weitzman M. L. Additive Damages, Fat-Tailed Climate Dynam- ics, and Uncertain Discounting[ P]. Working paper, 2009.
  • 9Martin L. Weitzman. Additive Damages, Fat- Tailed Climate Dynamics, and Uncertain Discounting [ A ]. The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present[ C]. National Bu- reau of Economic Research Conference Report,2011:23 -46.
  • 10Helfand G.E. Standards versus Standards: The Effects of Dif- ferent Pollution Restrictions [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1991, (3) :622 -634.

二级参考文献62

共引文献468

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部