期刊文献+

程序公平效应有限情境研究

程序公平效应有限情境研究
下载PDF
导出
摘要 程序公平效应强调程序公平可以使个体对不利结果的负面反应有所缓和。最近发展的程序公平效应有限情境的研究提出,程序公平存在着有限性,除了因变量之外,个体对事件的自我解释、对自我心理的调节倾向、在群体中的地位、组织中群体对程序公平的认同度都影响着程序公平的效应。本文关于程序公平效应有限情境的探讨从理论上有助于调和程序公平效应与反程序公平效应的矛盾结果,同时也给管理实践者提供了启示,使其在管理中能更好地促进程序公平效应的发生,提高管理效能。 Procedural fairness effect emphasized that procedural fairness could mitigate the individual' s negative reaction to the unfa- vorable outcomes, However, the latest research on the boundary condition of procedural fairness effect argued that there was limited influence in procedural fairness. Except for the dependent variables, there were other factors which would have in- fluence on procedural fairness effect, such as self - construal, regulatory locus, relative status, and group identification. The present paper explored the boundary condition of procedural fairness effect, which would help to conciliate the contradictory findings in theoretical research and provide practitioners with some implications to improve management effectiveness.
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2013年第2期110-113,共4页 Enterprise Economy
基金 广西科技大学(筹)博士启动基金项目"我国欠发达地区人才引力提升策略研究"(批准号:03081577)
关键词 程序公平 程序公平效应 有限情境 procedural fairness procedural fairness effect boundary condition
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Chen, Y. R., Brockner, J., Greenberg, J.. When is it "a pleasure to do business with you?" the effects of relative sta- tus, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness[J]. Organiza- tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003, 92(1): 1 -21.
  • 2Schroth, H., Shah, P.. Procedures, do we really want to know them? [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85 (3): 462 - 471.
  • 3Brockner, J., De Cremer, D., Fishman, A. Y., Spiegel, S.. When does high procedural fairness reduce self- evaluations following unfavorable outcomes?: the moderating ef- fect of prevention focus[J] . Journal of Experimental Social Psy- chology, 2008, 44(2): 187-200.
  • 4Holmvall, C. M., & Bobocel, D. R.. What fair pro- cedures say about me: self-construals and reactions to proce- dural fairness[J] . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008, 105(1): 147-168.
  • 5Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Vevea, J. L.. Pancultural self- enhancement reloaded: a meta- analytic reply to Heine[J] Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 89(3): 539 -551.
  • 6Broekner, J.. Making sense of procedural fairness: how high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1): 58-76.
  • 7Brockner, J.. De Cremer D van den Bos K, Chen Y. The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects[J] . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 96(1): 155 - 167.
  • 8Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., Higgins, E. T.. Imagin- ing how gou' d feel: the role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit[J] . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004, 30(4): 926-937.
  • 9Van Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M.. Group belongingness and procedural justice: social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice[J] . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 87 ( 1 ) : 66 - 79.
  • 10Leung, K., Tong, K., Lind, E. A.. Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on accep- tance of political decision[J] . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92 (3) : 476 - 489.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部