期刊文献+

我国教师的专业发展实践及其对学生成绩的影响:基于五城市调研的分析 被引量:14

Chinese Teacher Professional Development Practice and Its Effects on Students' Achievement:Based on a Survey for Five Sample Cities
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于对我国教师专业共同体导向的专业发展实践的关注,本研究在五个城市调研基础上,考察我国教师的专业发展实践特征及其与学生学业成就的关系。通过数据分析,研究描述了取样城市教师的备课方式、培训参与、同行听评课、教科研参与等有关参数的分布,以及上述分布中的城市间、学校间、城-郊间的差异,描绘样本城市的教师专业实践、特别是专业学习共同体的发展样态;通过控制学生背景变量、教师背景变量和教学方式的变量,研究发现了教师专业发展实践的整体模型与学生数学成绩的关联,并建立了相关数量模型。本研究还希望,基于上述考察,从教师专业发展实践这一侧面来验证上海学生PISA成绩的代表性。 This study, focusing on the Chinese teacher professional development practice ( PDP), explores how this practice is community - oriented and how it affects students' achievement. Planning Lesson, participating in formal professional training, observing classroom, participating in teaching and learning research, as the four typical types of Chinese teacher professional development practice, are examined through data analysis. This study describes the distribution of the parameters above from the data from the five sample cities and tries to find their difference between cities, between schools, and between downtown and rural areas. After controlling the variables of students SES, teachers characters and teaching methods, the correlation between the integrated model of PDP and students achievement ( mathematics achievement in this case) is found and represented as a quantitative model. It is also deduced that, collective lesson planning, among all the types of the PDP, may have the most evident effects on students' achievement.
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期22-33,53,共13页 Global Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2009年度重大项目"学习与课程之关系研究"(项目编号:2009JJD880011)研究成果之一
关键词 教师专业发展实践 学业成就 关系模型 teachers ' professional development practice academic achievement relationalmodel
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1柯政,陈霜叶,任友群.重点学校与非重点学校的校长领导行为比较[J].北京大学教育评论,2013,11(1):63-82. 被引量:8
  • 2OECD TALIS (Teaching and Learning International Survey). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS [ M ]. OECD Publishing. 2009:19 -21.
  • 3Prince , C. D. & Koppich, J. What do we know about the relationship between student achievement and teachers' educational attainment and experience, which is the traditional way that teacher salaries are deter- mined? [ EB/OL]. [2011 - 12 - 20]. http://cecr, ed. gov/ Q% 20A2. pdf. % 20Synthesis_.
  • 4McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. Building School - Based Teacher Learning Communities: Professional Strategies to Improve Student Achievement [ M ]. New York: Teachers College Press. 2006.
  • 5Stigler, J. W. & Stevenson, H. W. How Asian Teachers Polish Each Lesson to Perfection[ J]. American Educator. 1991, 15(1) :12 -20, 43 -47.
  • 6Paine, L.W. The Teacher as Virtuoso: A Chinese Model for Teaching [ J ]. Teachers College Record. 1990, 92(1) :49 -81.
  • 7Darling - Harmond, L. Teaching as profession : lessons in Teacher Preparation and professional Devel- opment [ J ]. Phi Delta Kappan. 2009, 87 (3) :237 - 240.
  • 8周彬.学校管理与教师专业发展[Z].转引自丁钢.中国中小学教师专业发展状况调查与政策分析报告[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010:194-210.
  • 9庞维国,徐晓波,林立甲,任友群.家庭社会经济地位与中学生学业成绩的关系研究[J].全球教育展望,2013,42(2):12-21. 被引量:60
  • 10郑太年,王美,林立甲,文剑冰.我国教师的教学方法及其对学生数学成绩和问题解决能力的影响[J].全球教育展望,2013,42(2):34-44. 被引量:27

二级参考文献111

  • 1马晓强,彭文蓉,萨丽·托马斯.学校效能的增值评价——对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究[J].教育研究,2006,27(10):77-84. 被引量:101
  • 2师保国,申继亮.家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):30-34. 被引量:183
  • 3柯政.学校变革困难的新制度主义解释[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(1):42-54. 被引量:61
  • 4方勋臣.重点中学可以休吗?[J]//钟启泉,等.解读中国教育[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000:318-323.
  • 5Carbonaro, W. Sector differences in student learning: Differences in achievement gains across school years and during the summer [J]. Journal of Catholic Education, 2003, (7).
  • 6Carbonaro,W.. Public-private differences in achievement among Kindergarten students: Differences in learning opportunities and student outcomes[J]. American Journal of Education, 2006, (113).
  • 7Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools [J]. Sociology of Education, 1982, (55).
  • 8Lubienski, S. & Lubienski, C. School sector and academic achievement: A multilevel analysis of NAEP data [J]. American Education Research Journal, 2006, (43).
  • 9Morgan, S. L. Counterfaetuals, causal effect heterogeneity, and the Catholic school effect on learning [J]. Sociology of Education, 2001, (74).
  • 10Reardon, S., Cheadle, J., & Robinson, J. The effect of Catholic schooling on math and reading development in Kindergarten through fifth grade [J]. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2009, (2).

共引文献100

同被引文献202

引证文献14

二级引证文献167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部