期刊文献+

二元悖论约束下创新型企业绩效的影响因素--基于498家国家级创新型试点企业的实证分析 被引量:4

The Analysis of Innovative Enterprises’ Influencing Factors under Dual Paradox Constraint
原文传递
导出
摘要 论文将创新型企业的评价与影响因素研究相联系,重点考察创新型企业如何突破二元性悖论约束,提升创新绩效。通过逐步回归与分位数相结合的方法指出:(1)创新型企业的成长将会受到二元性悖论约束;(2)二元性悖论约束下,创新绩效导向分为产品导向型、专有技术导向型、共性技术导向型;(3)三种不同绩效导向下,投入能力、组织结构、企业行为以及创新文化等因素对创新型企业在作用程度、作用方向与演变特征上产生不同影响。 The paper links up the innovative enterprises' evaluation with their influence factors, focuses on how could innovative enterprises break through ambidexterity paradox comtmint and enhance their innovation performance, Through combination of stepwise regression and quantile regression, we point out that: (1) innovative enterprises' growth will be under the constraint of ambidexterity paradox; (2) under the constraint of ambidexerity paradox, innovation peffommnce can be divided into three types: product oriented, proprietary technology oriented, generic technology oriented; (3) input capability, organization structure, enterprise behavior and innovative culture have different effect on innovation enterprises' different oriented innovation performance, with different extent, direction and evolution characteristics.
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期43-51,共9页 Finance & Economics
基金 2011年度教育部人文社科基金“非均质后发大国中经济极化、区域互动与协调发展的路径选择研究”(编号:11YJC790307)
关键词 二元性悖论 绩效导向 创新型企业 Dual Paradox Performance Orientation Innovative Enterprise
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1He, Zi- lin, Wong, Poh- Kam. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of ambidexterity [J]. Orga- nization Science, 2004, 15.
  • 2March, James G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning [J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2.
  • 3Siren, C. A., M. Kohtam? ki, et al.. Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap [ J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2012, 6 (1).
  • 4Bennex, M. J. & Tushaum, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilenmma revisited [J]. Academy af Management Review, 2003. 28.
  • 5吴玉鸣.大学、企业研发与区域创新的空间统计与计量分析[J].数理统计与管理,2007,26(2):318-324. 被引量:81
  • 6Leifer, R., C. M. McDermott, et al. Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts [M]. Boston: Hatvard Business Press. 2000.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Aelin,L.1988a.Spatial Econometrics:Methods and Models,Dordrecht,Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 2Anselin,L.Varga A.,Acs,Z.(1997) Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Ihnovations[J].dournal of Urban Economics,42,422 -448.
  • 3Cliff,A.D.and,J.IK.(1981),Spatial Processes.Models and Applications[M].Pion Limited,London.
  • 4Cresie,N.A.C.1993.Statistics for Spatial Data.Wiley New York.
  • 5Moran,P.P.A 1950.Notes on Continuous Stichastrc Phenomona Biometrika,37,17-23.
  • 6Geary,R.C.1954 The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping.The Incorporated Statistician,5.
  • 7Anselin,L.,Florax,R.1995 Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models.in L.Anselin and R.Florax Eds..New Direetions in Spatial Econometrics[M].Springer,Berlin.pp21 -74.
  • 8Jaffe,A 1989.Real effects of academic research[J].American Economic Review.79,957 -970.
  • 9Griliches,Z.1986.Productivity,R&D,and basic research at the firm level in the 1970[J].American Economic Review.76,[4]-154.

共引文献80

同被引文献64

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部