期刊文献+

认知社会语言学视域下的认知参照点与概念整合理论研究 被引量:38

Study on Cognitive Reference Point and Conceptual Blending in the Perspective of Cognitive Sociolinguistics
原文传递
导出
摘要 自Fauconnier提出概念整合理论以来,该理论在语言研究中展现了较大解释力,但其忽视了认知参照点和社会因素在概念整合过程中的重要作用。而认知社会语言学又将社会、认知和语言视为该学科的主要研究内容,力主将以上三要素纳入整体进行考察。基于此,本文在认知社会语言学视域下,以《人民日报》一组"雷人的‘楼盘文化’"广告为语料,辅以问卷调查数据,考察社会、认知和语言三者的关系。本研究发现,在特定社会语境下,认知参照点在概念整合过程中的错位是广告商和消费者对同一事件进行不同阐释的认知理据,也是"雷人"广告的震撼力所在。据此,在认知社会语言学视域下,本文论述了将概念整合理论立足于认知参照点的可行性和必要性。 Since it was firstly proposed by Fauconnier, Conceptu- al Blending Theory (CBT) has shown great explanatory power in linguistic studies. However, the theory neglects the significant role of cognitive reference point (CRP) and social factors in the process of conceptual blending. Cognitive Sociolinguistics re- gards society, cognition and language as its main content and holds the basic viewpoint that the three factors above should be studied as a whole. Accordingly,the paper, in the perspective of Cognitive Sociolinguisties, conducts a research on "a set of stunning advertisements of real estate culture" from People's Daily and the data from a questionnaire to interpret and analyze the relation of society, cognition and language. The research finds out that cognitive reference point divergence, as the sensa- tional bit of those stunning advertisements, should be the cogni- tive motivation of different interpretations from advertisers and consumers over the same thing under certain social context. Thus, the paper, in the perspective of Cognitive Sociolinguistics, expounds the feasibility and necessity of setting up CRP as the foundation of CBT.
作者 赵永峰
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期5-9,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 重庆市2009年社科规划项目"认知音位学研究"(项目编号:2009YY23) 四川外语学院2008年社科规划项目"构造语法框架下的认知音位学研究"(项目编号:2008-10) 2011年四川外语学院重大科研项目"认知语言学理论与实践"(项目编号:SISU2011ZD04)阶段性成果
关键词 认知社会语言学 认知参照点 概念整合 Cognitive Sociolinguistics Cognitive Reference Point Conceptual Blending
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Cantor,N. & W. Mischel. 1977. Traits as prototypes:Effects on rec- ognition memory [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (35) :38 -48.
  • 2Croft, W. & D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge & New York:Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces[ M ]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • 4Fauconnier,G. 1997. Mapping in Thought and Language[ M]. Cam- bridge: Cambridge Uriversity Press.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think [ M ]. New York : Basic Books.
  • 6Fiske, S. & S. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition ( 2nd edition ) [ M ]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 7Geeraerts, D. , G. Kristiansen & Y. Peirsman. 2010. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics [ C ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 8Harder, P. 1999. Partial autonomy, ontology and methodology in cog- nitive linguistics[A]. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker ( eds. ). Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology [ C ]. Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 9Kristiansen, G. & R. Dirven. 2008. Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Lan- guage Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems [ M ]. Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Langacker, R. 1993. Reference-point constructions [ J ]. CognitiveLinguistics ,4 ( 1 ) : 1 - 38.

二级参考文献120

共引文献157

同被引文献329

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部